Backpack Battles vs Stoneshard
Backpack Battles is a roguelike strategy game from PlayWithFurcifer (2025) while Stoneshard is an open-world roguelike game from Ink Stains Games (2020).
What each one is
Steam files Backpack Battles under Roguelike and Strategy. In contrast, it files Stoneshard under Open-World and Roguelike.
A PvP inventory management auto battler! Buy and craft powerful items, then carefully arrange them in your backpack.
Stoneshard is a hardcore turn-based RPG about the harsh life of a medieval mercenary: travel with your own caravan, descend into procedurally generated dungeons, learn new skills, survive hunger and injuries - and remember, every mistake can mean death and loss of progress.
At a glance
| Backpack Battles | Stoneshard | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.8/10 | 6.8/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (91%, 20,654) | Mostly Positive (75%, 35,515) |
| Critic aggregate | No aggregate | No aggregate |
| Price | $14.99 | $24.99 |
| Install size | 0.29 GB | 1 GB |
| Steam Deck | verified | playable |
| Released | 2025 | 2020 |
| Developer | PlayWithFurcifer | Ink Stains Games |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Backpack Battles vs Stoneshard, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Backpack BattlesRoguelike strategy gameStoneshardOpen-world roguelike gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Backpack BattlesEarly Access, Auto Battler, Inventory ManagementStoneshardRPG, Rogue-like, StrategyThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Backpack Battles ✓Score 7.8 · 91% on SteamStoneshardScore 6.8 · 75% on SteamThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Backpack Battles20,654 reviews · 0.29 GBStoneshard35,515 reviews · 3 add-ons · 1 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Backpack Battles ✓$14.99Stoneshard$24.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Backpack Battles ✓VerifiedStoneshardPlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Backpack Battles takes 3 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueBackpack Battles and Stoneshard on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Backpack Battles (GamingPickz Score 7.8)
- The cheaper right now: Backpack Battles ($14.99)
- Better on a Steam Deck: Backpack Battles (verified)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
Early AccessStrategyIndieRogue-likeTurn-BasedReplay Value2D
Where they differ
Auto BattlerInventory ManagementPvPRoguelike DeckbuilderAsynchronous MultiplayerMultiplayer
RPGPixel GraphicsSurvivalOpen World Survival CraftProcedural GenerationSingleplayer
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Backpack Battles is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Stoneshard is demanding, for players who want a challenge.
System requirements, side by side
| Backpack Battles | Stoneshard | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | GTX 1060 3G | GeForce GT 430 |
| Minimum CPU | Dual Core 2 GHz | Intel i3 5050U |
| Minimum RAM | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Install size | 0.29 GB | 1 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Backpack Battles · Stoneshard.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Backpack Battles and 0 for Stoneshard. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Backpack Battles and Stoneshard in scope?
Backpack Battles has drawn 20,654 Steam reviews and installs in 0.29 GB. Stoneshard has drawn 35,515 Steam reviews, ships 3 add-ons and installs in 1 GB.
Is Backpack Battles or Stoneshard better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Backpack Battles rates higher (7.8 to 6.8). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Backpack Battles or Stoneshard?
Backpack Battles is cheaper right now at $14.99, against $24.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.