GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Biomutant vs Monster Hunter Wilds

Biomutant is an action-RPG open-world game from Experiment 101 (2021) while Monster Hunter Wilds is an action-RPG open-world game from CAPCOM Co., Ltd. (2025).

Biomutant

2021 · Experiment 101

5.9GamingPickz Score

$39.99

Steam: Mixed

Monster Hunter Wilds

2025 · CAPCOM Co., Ltd.

5.5GamingPickz Score

$39.99

Steam: Mixed

What each one is

Steam files Biomutant under Action-RPG and Open-World. In contrast, it files Monster Hunter Wilds under Action-RPG and Open-World.

Biomutant

BIOMUTANT® is an open-world, post-apocalyptic Kung-Fu fable RPG, with a unique martial arts styled combat system allowing you to mix melee, shooting and mutant ability action.

Description from its Steam store page

Monster Hunter Wilds

The unbridled force of nature runs wild and relentless, with environments transforming drastically from one moment to the next. This is a story of monsters and humans and their struggles to live in harmony in a world of duality.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

BiomutantMonster Hunter Wilds
GamingPickz Score5.9/105.5/10
Steam ratingMixed (66%, 20,181)Mixed (49%, 328,877)
Critic aggregate66/100No aggregate
Price$39.99$39.99
Install size25 GB75 GB
Steam Deckplayableverified
Released20212025
DeveloperExperiment 101CAPCOM Co., Ltd.

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Biomutant vs Monster Hunter Wilds, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    BiomutantAction-RPG open-world game
    Monster Hunter WildsAction-RPG open-world game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    BiomutantOpen World, Action, RPG
    Monster Hunter WildsHunting, Action, Online Co-Op

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    BiomutantScore 5.9 · 66% on Steam · 66 critic
    Monster Hunter WildsScore 5.5 · 49% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Biomutant20,181 reviews · 2 add-ons · 25 GB
    Monster Hunter Wilds328,877 reviews · 201 add-ons · 75 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Biomutant$39.99
    Monster Hunter Wilds$39.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    BiomutantPlayable
    Monster Hunter WildsVerified

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Biomutant and Monster Hunter Wilds on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC
  • Xbox

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Biomutant (GamingPickz Score 5.9)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: Monster Hunter Wilds (verified)
  • Lighter on storage: Biomutant (25 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Monster Hunter Wilds (328,877 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

Open WorldActionSingleplayerRPGAdventureCharacter CustomizationThird PersonFantasy

Where they differ

Biomutant is also

Post-apocalypticHack and SlashExplorationMartial ArtsStory RichSci-fi

Monster Hunter Wilds is also

HuntingOnline Co-OpCo-opDating SimDragonsGreat Soundtrack

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Biomutant is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Monster Hunter Wilds is demanding, for players who want a challenge.

System requirements, side by side

BiomutantMonster Hunter Wilds
Minimum GPU4 GB Direct3D 11 capable video card - GeForce GTX 960NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 1660(
Minimum CPUAMD FX-8350Intel® Core™ i5-10400
Minimum RAM8 GB16 GB
Install size25 GB75 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Biomutant · Monster Hunter Wilds.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Biomutant and 8 for Monster Hunter Wilds. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Biomutant and Monster Hunter Wilds in scope?

Biomutant has drawn 20,181 Steam reviews, ships 2 add-ons and installs in 25 GB. Monster Hunter Wilds has drawn 328,877 Steam reviews, ships 201 add-ons and installs in 75 GB.

Is Biomutant or Monster Hunter Wilds better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Biomutant rates higher (5.9 to 5.5). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Biomutant or Monster Hunter Wilds?

Biomutant is cheaper right now at $39.99, against $39.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each