GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007) vs The Walking Dead

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007) is an FPS game from Infinity Ward (2007) while The Walking Dead is a horror survival game from Telltale Games (2012).

Quick answer: The Walking Dead rates higher, 8.4 to 8.3 on the GamingPickz Score, and The Walking Dead is the cheaper at $14.99.

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007)

2007 · Infinity Ward

8.3GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Very Positive

The Walking Dead

2012 · Telltale Games

8.4GamingPickz Score

$14.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

What each one is

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007) is filed under FPS. In contrast, The Walking Dead under Horror and Survival.

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007)

The new action-thriller from the award-winning team at Infinity Ward, the creators of the Call of Duty® series, delivers the most intense and cinematic action experience ever. Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare arms gamers with an arsenal of advanced and powerful modern day firepower and transports them to the most treacherous hotspots...

Description from its Steam store page

The Walking Dead

A five-part adventure horror series set in the same universe as Robert Kirkman’s award-winning comic book series.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007)The Walking Dead
GamingPickz Score8.3/108.4/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (94%, 27,089)Overwhelmingly Positive (97%, 80,414)
Critic aggregate92/10082/100
Price$19.99$14.99
Install size
Steam Deckunsupportedverified
Released20072012
DeveloperInfinity WardTelltale Games

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007) vs The Walking Dead, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007)FPS game
    The Walking DeadHorror survival game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007)FPS, Action, Shooter
    The Walking DeadZombies, Story Rich, Adventure

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007)Score 8.3 · 94% on Steam · 92 critic
    The Walking DeadScore 8.4 · 97% on Steam · 82 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007)27,089 reviews
    The Walking Dead80,414 reviews · 1 add-on

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007)$19.99
    The Walking Dead$14.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007)Unsupported
    The Walking DeadVerified

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

The Walking Dead takes 3 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007) and The Walking Dead on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The cheaper right now: The Walking Dead ($14.99)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: The Walking Dead (verified)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: The Walking Dead (80,414 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

ActionSingleplayerStory RichAtmosphericZombies

Where they differ

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007) is also

FPSMultiplayerShooterFirst-PersonClassicMilitary

The Walking Dead is also

AdventurePoint & ClickEpisodicChoices MatterDramaHorror

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007) is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. The Walking Dead is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007)The Walking Dead
Minimum GPU
Minimum CPU2.0 GHz Pentium 4
Minimum RAM3 GB
Install size

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007) · The Walking Dead.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007) and 1 for The Walking Dead. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007) and The Walking Dead in scope?

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007) has drawn 27,089 Steam reviews. The Walking Dead has drawn 80,414 Steam reviews and ships 1 add-on.

Is Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007) or The Walking Dead better?

By the GamingPickz Score, The Walking Dead rates higher (8.4 to 8.3). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007) or The Walking Dead?

The Walking Dead is cheaper right now at $14.99, against $19.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Should I get Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007) or The Walking Dead?

The Walking Dead rates higher, 8.4 to 8.3 on the GamingPickz Score, and The Walking Dead is the cheaper at $14.99. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each