Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017) vs The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017) is an FPS game from Raven Software (2017) while The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare is an FPS game from Virtual Basement LLC (2015).
What each one is
Steam files Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017) under FPS. In contrast, it files The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare under FPS.
One of the most critically-acclaimed games in history, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare is back, remastered in true high-definition, featuring improved textures, physically based rendering, high-dynamic range lighting and much more.
Take part of history’s greatest battle of Green VS. Tan. Fight amongst and against others online. Jump, shoot and roll your way into victory with fast paced objective based gameplay. Sometimes the greatest battles are fought by the smallest of soldiers.
At a glance
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017) | The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 5.3/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Steam rating | Mixed (54%, 15,762) | Very Positive (82%, 10,206) |
| Critic aggregate | No aggregate | No aggregate |
| Price | $39.99 | $9.99 |
| Install size | — | 14 GB |
| Steam Deck | unsupported | playable |
| Released | 2017 | 2015 |
| Developer | Raven Software | Virtual Basement LLC |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017) vs The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017)FPS gameThe Mean Greens - Plastic WarfareFPS gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017)FPS, Shooter, ActionThe Mean Greens - Plastic WarfareAction, Third-Person Shooter, ShooterThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017)Score 5.3 · 54% on SteamThe Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare ✓Score 7.0 · 82% on SteamThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017)15,762 reviews · 1 add-onThe Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare10,206 reviews · 2 add-ons · 14 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017)$39.99The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare ✓$9.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017)UnsupportedThe Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare ✓PlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare takes 3 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueCall of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017) and The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare (GamingPickz Score 7.0)
- The cheaper right now: The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare ($9.99)
- Better on a Steam Deck: The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare (playable)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
FPSSingleplayerMultiplayerShooterActionMilitaryFirst-PersonCo-op
Where they differ
WarControllerViolentStory RichRemakeClassic
Third-Person ShooterFunnyIndieGreat SoundtrackColorfulFast-Paced
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017) is relaxed, easy to pick up. The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare is relaxed, easy to pick up.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017) and 1 for The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017) and The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare in scope?
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017) has drawn 15,762 Steam reviews and ships 1 add-on. The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare has drawn 10,206 Steam reviews, ships 2 add-ons and installs in 14 GB.
Is Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017) or The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare better?
By the GamingPickz Score, The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare rates higher (7.0 to 5.3). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered (2017) or The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare?
The Mean Greens - Plastic Warfare is cheaper right now at $9.99, against $39.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.