Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 vs Vampire Survivors
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 is an action-RPG JRPG game from Sandfall Interactive (2025) while Vampire Survivors is an action-RPG roguelike game from poncle (2022).
What each one is
Steam files Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 under Action-RPG and JRPG. In contrast, it files Vampire Survivors under Action-RPG and Roguelike.
Lead the members of Expedition 33 on their quest to destroy the Paintress so that she can never paint death again. Explore a world of wonders inspired by Belle Époque France and battle unique enemies in this turn-based RPG with real-time mechanics.
Mow down thousands of night creatures and survive until dawn! Vampire Survivors is a gothic horror casual game with rogue-lite elements, where your choices can allow you to quickly snowball against the hundreds of monsters that get thrown at you. Be the bullet hell!
At a glance
| Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 | Vampire Survivors | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 8.7/10 | 8.8/10 |
| Steam rating | Overwhelmingly Positive (95%, 277,064) | Overwhelmingly Positive (98%, 265,103) |
| Critic aggregate | 91/100 | 86/100 |
| Price | $47.99 | $3.74 |
| Install size | 55 GB | 2.44 GB |
| Steam Deck | verified | verified |
| Released | 2025 | 2022 |
| Developer | Sandfall Interactive | poncle |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 vs Vampire Survivors, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33Action-RPG JRPG gameVampire SurvivorsAction-RPG roguelike gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33Turn-Based Combat, Story Rich, FantasyVampire SurvivorsAction Roguelike, Bullet Hell, Pixel GraphicsThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33Score 8.7 · 95% on Steam · 91 criticVampire Survivors ✓Score 8.8 · 98% on Steam · 86 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33277,064 reviews · 4 add-ons · 55 GBVampire Survivors265,103 reviews · 9 add-ons · 2.44 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33$47.99Vampire Survivors ✓$3.74Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33VerifiedVampire SurvivorsVerifiedValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Vampire Survivors takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueClair Obscur: Expedition 33 and Vampire Survivors on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Vampire Survivors (GamingPickz Score 8.8)
- The cheaper right now: Vampire Survivors ($3.74)
- Lighter on storage: Vampire Survivors (2.44 GB)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
RPGSingleplayerAction RPGDark FantasyAction
Where they differ
Turn-Based CombatStory RichFantasyExplorationJRPGAdventure
Action RoguelikeBullet HellPixel GraphicsRogue-liteVampire2D
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Vampire Survivors is demanding, for players who want a challenge.
System requirements, side by side
| Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 | Vampire Survivors | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB / AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6 GB / Intel Arc A380 6 GB | DX11 |
| Minimum CPU | Intel Core i7-8700K / AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | x64 architecture with SSE2 instruction set support |
| Minimum RAM | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Install size | 55 GB | 2.44 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 · Vampire Survivors.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 6 accessibility features for Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 and 1 for Vampire Survivors. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 and Vampire Survivors in scope?
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 has drawn 277,064 Steam reviews, ships 4 add-ons and installs in 55 GB. Vampire Survivors has drawn 265,103 Steam reviews, ships 9 add-ons and installs in 2.44 GB.
Is Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 or Vampire Survivors better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Vampire Survivors rates higher (8.8 to 8.7). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 or Vampire Survivors?
Vampire Survivors is cheaper right now at $3.74, against $47.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.