Clannad vs The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty
Clannad is an action-adventure horror game from Key (2004) while The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty is a horror RPG game from 零创游戏(ZerocreationGame) (2024).
What each one is
Steam files Clannad under Action-Adventure and Horror. In contrast, it files The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty under Horror and RPG.
From the world renowned visual novel studio Key, the highly rated story of CLANNAD is now available on Steam! Improved visuals, achievement integration, and Dangopedia make this the best version of CLANNAD to date.
He is a bandit who sells lives. She is a mute girl seeking revenge. In a famine-ravaged ancient China, a ruthless trafficker escorts four girls to a demon's feast. But when a deadly secret is revealed, a cold transaction turns into a journey of redemption. A dark visual novel about an unlikely bond.
At a glance
| Clannad | The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 8.1/10 | 8.1/10 |
| Steam rating | Overwhelmingly Positive (98%, 10,936) | Very Positive (94%, 59,944) |
| Critic aggregate | 83/100 | 79/100 |
| Price | $44.99 | $9.99 |
| Install size | 7 GB | 3 GB |
| Steam Deck | unsupported | verified |
| Released | 2004 | 2024 |
| Developer | Key | 零创游戏(ZerocreationGame) |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Clannad vs The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
ClannadAction-adventure horror gameThe Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming DynastyHorror RPG gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
ClannadVisual Novel, Anime, Story RichThe Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming DynastyVisual Novel, Historical, Multiple EndingsThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
ClannadScore 8.1 · 98% on Steam · 83 criticThe Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming DynastyScore 8.1 · 94% on Steam · 79 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Clannad10,936 reviews · 4 add-ons · 7 GBThe Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty59,944 reviews · 2 add-ons · 3 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Clannad$44.99The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty ✓$9.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
ClannadUnsupportedThe Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty ✓VerifiedValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueClannad and The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- Mobile
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The cheaper right now: The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty ($9.99)
- Better on a Steam Deck: The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty (verified)
- Lighter on storage: The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty (3 GB)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty (59,944 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
Visual NovelAnimeStory RichRomanceDramaMultiple EndingsDating SimSingleplayer
Where they differ
Great SoundtrackClassicChoices MatterEmotionalAtmosphericComedy
HistoricalCookingInteractive FictionDarkWord GameRPG
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Clannad is relaxed, easy to pick up. The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty is relaxed, easy to pick up.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Clannad and 1 for The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Clannad and The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty in scope?
Clannad has drawn 10,936 Steam reviews, ships 4 add-ons and installs in 7 GB. The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty has drawn 59,944 Steam reviews, ships 2 add-ons and installs in 3 GB.
Is Clannad or The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Clannad rates higher (8.1 to 8.1). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Clannad or The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty?
The Hungry Lamb: Traveling in the Late Ming Dynasty is cheaper right now at $9.99, against $44.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.