GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist vs NGU IDLE

Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist is a horror puzzle game from Crows Crows Crows (2015) while NGU IDLE is a horror RPG game from 4G (2019).

Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist

2015 · Crows Crows Crows

7.7GamingPickz Score

Free

Steam: Very Positive

NGU IDLE

2019 · 4G

8.0GamingPickz Score

Free

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

What each one is

Steam files Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist under Horror and Puzzle. In contrast, it files NGU IDLE under Horror and RPG.

Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist

A 15 minute heist game by Crows Crows Crows & Directed by William Pugh (The Stanley Parable). Slip into the soft-soled shoes of the mastermind responsible for the greatest heist- oh god I can’t do this any more, i’m joining the strike. good luck writing the steam description. -tina

Description from its Steam store page

NGU IDLE

NGU Idle is a Free To Play Idle game that's full of weird humor, tons of upgrades and hundreds of hours of content! Try out NGU Idle today and experience the joy of Numbers Going Up!

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind HeistNGU IDLE
GamingPickz Score7.7/108.0/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (93%, 10,175)Overwhelmingly Positive (96%, 12,947)
Critic aggregateNo aggregateNo aggregate
PriceFreeFree
Install size1 GB0.15 GB
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20152019
DeveloperCrows Crows Crows4G

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist vs NGU IDLE, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind HeistHorror puzzle game
    NGU IDLEHorror RPG game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind HeistFree to Play, Comedy, First-Person
    NGU IDLEFree to Play, Idler, Indie

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind HeistScore 7.7 · 93% on Steam
    NGU IDLEScore 8.0 · 96% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist10,175 reviews · 1 GB
    NGU IDLE12,947 reviews · 0.15 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind HeistFree
    NGU IDLEFree

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind HeistPlayable
    NGU IDLEPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

NGU IDLE takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist and NGU IDLE on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: NGU IDLE (GamingPickz Score 8.0)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

Free to PlayIndieFunnySingleplayerStory RichCasualAdventurePsychological Horror

Where they differ

Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist is also

ComedyFirst-PersonNarrationWalking SimulatorShortHeist

NGU IDLE is also

IdlerClickerSimulationRPG

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist is relaxed, easy to pick up. NGU IDLE is relaxed, easy to pick up.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist and 0 for NGU IDLE. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Close to Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist

Common questions

How different are Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist and NGU IDLE in scope?

Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist has drawn 10,175 Steam reviews and installs in 1 GB. NGU IDLE has drawn 12,947 Steam reviews and installs in 0.15 GB.

Is Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist or NGU IDLE better?

By the GamingPickz Score, NGU IDLE rates higher (8.0 to 7.7). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist or NGU IDLE?

Dr. Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald: A Whirlwind Heist is cheaper right now at Free, against Free. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each