GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Foundation vs Going Medieval

Foundation is an open-world sandbox game from Polymorph Games (2025) while Going Medieval is an RPG sandbox game from Foxy Voxel (2026).

Foundation

2025 · Polymorph Games

7.7GamingPickz Score

$23.44

Steam: Very Positive

Going Medieval

2026 · Foxy Voxel

7.6GamingPickz Score

$22.49

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Foundation under Open-World and Sandbox. In contrast, it files Going Medieval under RPG and Sandbox.

Foundation

Foundation is a grid-less, laidback medieval city-building game with a focus on organic development, monument construction and resource management.

Description from its Steam store page

Going Medieval

Build and manage your own castle settlement in a land reclaimed by wilderness. With detailed management, survival strategy, and a moddable sandbox world, Going Medieval challenges you to build the mightiest colony this side of the apocalypse.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

FoundationGoing Medieval
GamingPickz Score7.7/107.6/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (87%, 24,163)Very Positive (89%, 21,362)
Critic aggregate84/10076/100
Price$23.44$22.49
Install size2 GB
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20252026
DeveloperPolymorph GamesFoxy Voxel

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Foundation vs Going Medieval, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    FoundationOpen-world sandbox game
    Going MedievalRPG sandbox game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    FoundationCity Builder, Simulation, Medieval
    Going MedievalRPG, Early Access, City Builder

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    FoundationScore 7.7 · 87% on Steam · 84 critic
    Going MedievalScore 7.6 · 89% on Steam · 76 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Foundation24,163 reviews · 3 add-ons
    Going Medieval21,362 reviews · 2 add-ons · 2 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Foundation$23.44
    Going Medieval$22.49

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    FoundationPlayable
    Going MedievalPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Foundation and Going Medieval on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Foundation (GamingPickz Score 7.7)
  • The cheaper right now: Going Medieval ($22.49)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

City BuilderSimulationStrategySandboxManagementEconomyBuildingIndie

Where they differ

Foundation is also

MedievalResource ManagementRelaxingAtmosphericOpen WorldChoices Matter

Going Medieval is also

RPGModdableReplay ValueProcedural Generation3DCrafting

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Foundation is relaxed, easy to pick up. Going Medieval is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

FoundationGoing Medieval
Minimum GPUNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4 GB)
Minimum CPUIntel Core i5-9400F
Minimum RAM8 GB
Install size2 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Foundation · Going Medieval.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Foundation and 6 for Going Medieval. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Foundation and Going Medieval in scope?

Foundation has drawn 24,163 Steam reviews and ships 3 add-ons. Going Medieval has drawn 21,362 Steam reviews, ships 2 add-ons and installs in 2 GB.

Is Foundation or Going Medieval better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Foundation rates higher (7.7 to 7.6). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Foundation or Going Medieval?

Going Medieval is cheaper right now at $22.49, against $23.44. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each