GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Hades II vs Monster Hunter: World

Hades II is an action-RPG roguelike game from Supergiant Games (2025) while Monster Hunter: World is an action-RPG JRPG game from CAPCOM Co., Ltd. (2018).

Hades II

2025 · Supergiant Games

8.7GamingPickz Score

$29.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

Monster Hunter: World

2018 · CAPCOM Co., Ltd.

8.5GamingPickz Score

$29.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Hades II under Action-RPG and Roguelike. In contrast, it files Monster Hunter: World under Action-RPG and JRPG.

Hades II

Battle beyond the Underworld using dark sorcery to take on the Titan of Time in this bewitching sequel to the award-winning rogue-like dungeon crawler.

Description from its Steam store page

Monster Hunter: World

Welcome to a new world! In Monster Hunter: World, the latest installment in the series, you can enjoy the ultimate hunting experience, using everything at your disposal to hunt monsters in a new world teeming with surprises and excitement.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Hades IIMonster Hunter: World
GamingPickz Score8.7/108.5/10
Steam ratingOverwhelmingly Positive (96%, 122,855)Very Positive (89%, 516,159)
Critic aggregate94/10088/100
Price$29.99$29.99
Install size11 GB52 GB
Steam Deckverifiedverified
Released20252018
DeveloperSupergiant GamesCAPCOM Co., Ltd.

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Hades II vs Monster Hunter: World, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Hades IIAction-RPG roguelike game
    Monster Hunter: WorldAction-RPG JRPG game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Hades IIAction, Rogue-like, Rogue-lite
    Monster Hunter: WorldCo-op, Action, Open World

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Hades IIScore 8.7 · 96% on Steam · 94 critic
    Monster Hunter: WorldScore 8.5 · 89% on Steam · 88 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Hades II122,855 reviews · 1 add-on · 11 GB
    Monster Hunter: World516,159 reviews · 200 add-ons · 52 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Hades II$29.99
    Monster Hunter: World$29.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Hades IIVerified
    Monster Hunter: WorldVerified

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Hades II takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Hades II and Monster Hunter: World on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Hades II (GamingPickz Score 8.7)
  • Lighter on storage: Hades II (11 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Monster Hunter: World (516,159 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

ActionHack and SlashRPGAction RPGSingleplayerAtmosphericSouls-like

Where they differ

Hades II is also

Rogue-likeRogue-liteAction RoguelikeMythologyDungeon CrawlerIsometric

Monster Hunter: World is also

Co-opMultiplayerOpen WorldCharacter CustomizationThird PersonAdventure

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Hades II is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Monster Hunter: World is demanding, for players who want a challenge.

System requirements, side by side

Hades IIMonster Hunter: World
Minimum GPUGeForce GTX 950NVIDIA®GeForce®GTX 760
Minimum CPUDual Core 2.4 GHzIntel® Core™ i5 4460
Minimum RAM8 GB8 GB
Install size11 GB52 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Hades II · Monster Hunter: World.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Hades II and 6 for Monster Hunter: World. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Hades II and Monster Hunter: World in scope?

Hades II has drawn 122,855 Steam reviews, ships 1 add-on and installs in 11 GB. Monster Hunter: World has drawn 516,159 Steam reviews, ships 200 add-ons and installs in 52 GB.

Is Hades II or Monster Hunter: World better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Hades II rates higher (8.7 to 8.5). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Hades II or Monster Hunter: World?

Hades II is cheaper right now at $29.99, against $29.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each