GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Puyo PuyoTetris vs Zuma

Puyo PuyoTetris is a fighting puzzle game from Sonic Team (2018) while Zuma is a puzzle strategy game from Oberon Media (2003).

Puyo PuyoTetris

2018 · Sonic Team

7.0GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Very Positive

Zuma

2003 · Oberon Media

7.7GamingPickz Score

$4.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

What each one is

Steam files Puyo PuyoTetris under Fighting and Puzzle. In contrast, it files Zuma under Puzzle and Strategy.

Puyo PuyoTetris

Two puzzle game juggernauts collide as global phenomenon Tetris® and SEGA’s famous Puyo Puyo™ combine in a super mash-up of ferocious competition, adorable looks, and addictive puzzle fun!

Description from its Steam store page

Zuma

Deep in the jungle lie hidden temples bursting with traps and trickery, and it's up to you to uncover their treasures. Fire magical balls from your stone frog idol to make matches of three or more and clear the deadly chain before it reaches the golden skull.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Puyo PuyoTetrisZuma
GamingPickz Score7.0/107.7/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (85%, 5,571)Overwhelmingly Positive (96%, 6,806)
Critic aggregateNo aggregateNo aggregate
Price$19.99$4.99
Install size7 GB
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20182003
DeveloperSonic TeamOberon Media

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Puyo PuyoTetris vs Zuma, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Puyo PuyoTetrisFighting puzzle game
    ZumaPuzzle strategy game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Puyo PuyoTetrisPuzzle, Casual, Competitive
    ZumaMatch 3, Puzzle, Arcade

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Puyo PuyoTetrisScore 7.0 · 85% on Steam
    ZumaScore 7.7 · 96% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Puyo PuyoTetris5,571 reviews · 7 GB
    Zuma6,806 reviews

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Puyo PuyoTetris$19.99
    Zuma$4.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Puyo PuyoTetrisPlayable
    ZumaPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Zuma takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Puyo PuyoTetris and Zuma on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularityZuma

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC
  • PlayStation

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Zuma (GamingPickz Score 7.7)
  • The cheaper right now: Zuma ($4.99)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

PuzzleCasualActionCuteColorfulArcade2DClassic

Where they differ

Puyo PuyoTetris is also

CompetitiveMultiplayerAnimeLocal MultiplayerGreat Soundtrack4 Player Local

Zuma is also

Match 3StrategyFamily FriendlyRetroPhysicsReplay Value

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Puyo PuyoTetris is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Zuma is demanding, for players who want a challenge.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Puyo PuyoTetris and 0 for Zuma. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Puyo PuyoTetris and Zuma in scope?

Puyo PuyoTetris has drawn 5,571 Steam reviews and installs in 7 GB. Zuma has drawn 6,806 Steam reviews.

Is Puyo PuyoTetris or Zuma better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Zuma rates higher (7.7 to 7.0). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Puyo PuyoTetris or Zuma?

Zuma is cheaper right now at $4.99, against $19.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each