ShareX vs SteamVR Performance Test
ShareX is a photo editing game from ShareX Team (2015) while SteamVR Performance Test is a horror soulslike game from Valve (2016).
What each one is
Steam files ShareX under Photo Editing and Utilities. In contrast, it files SteamVR Performance Test under Horror and Soulslike.
ShareX is a free and open source program that can capture or record selected area from the screen with a single keypress, automatically save them to your hard disk/clipboard, and instantly upload them to an image/file hosting service and then can copy the URL to your clipboard.
Check whether your system is VR Ready, and if not, whether its capabilities are bound by Graphics Card, CPU, or both.
At a glance
| ShareX | SteamVR Performance Test | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.8/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Steam rating | Overwhelmingly Positive (96%, 8,465) | Mostly Positive (77%, 5,310) |
| Critic aggregate | No aggregate | No aggregate |
| Price | Free | Not listed |
| Install size | 0.15 GB | — |
| Steam Deck | unsupported | unsupported |
| Released | 2015 | 2016 |
| Developer | ShareX Team | Valve |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
ShareX vs SteamVR Performance Test, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
ShareXPhoto editing gameSteamVR Performance TestHorror soulslike gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
ShareXPhoto Editing, Utilities, Free to PlaySteamVR Performance TestBenchmark, Software, UtilitiesThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
ShareX ✓Score 7.8 · 96% on SteamSteamVR Performance TestScore 6.5 · 77% on SteamThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
ShareX8,465 reviews · 0.15 GBSteamVR Performance Test5,310 reviewsReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
ShareXFreeSteamVR Performance TestNot listedRead live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
ShareXUnsupportedSteamVR Performance TestUnsupportedValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
ShareX takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueShareX and SteamVR Performance Test on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: ShareX (GamingPickz Score 7.8)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
UtilitiesFree to PlaySoftwareSexual Content
Where they differ
Photo EditingVideo ProductionDesign & IllustrationWeb PublishingAudio Production
VRBenchmarkHorrorNudityFemale ProtagonistAnime
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, ShareX is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. SteamVR Performance Test is demanding, for players who want a challenge.
System requirements, side by side
| ShareX | SteamVR Performance Test | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | — | — |
| Minimum CPU | — | — |
| Minimum RAM | 0.5 GB | — |
| Install size | 0.15 GB | — |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: ShareX · SteamVR Performance Test.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for ShareX and 0 for SteamVR Performance Test. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are ShareX and SteamVR Performance Test in scope?
ShareX has drawn 8,465 Steam reviews and installs in 0.15 GB. SteamVR Performance Test has drawn 5,310 Steam reviews.
Is ShareX or SteamVR Performance Test better?
By the GamingPickz Score, ShareX rates higher (7.8 to 6.5). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, ShareX or SteamVR Performance Test?
One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.