GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners vs ZERO Sievert

The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners is an FPS horror game from Skydance Interactive (2020) while ZERO Sievert is a horror open-world game from CABO Studio (2024).

The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners

2020 · Skydance Interactive

7.2GamingPickz Score

$9.99

Steam: Very Positive

ZERO Sievert

2024 · CABO Studio

7.5GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners under FPS and Horror. In contrast, it files ZERO Sievert under Horror and Open-World.

The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners

Saints & Sinners is a game unlike any other in The Walking Dead universe. Every challenge you face and decision you make is driven by YOU. Fight the undead, scavenge through the flooded ruins of New Orleans, and face gut-wrenching choices for you and the other survivors. Live The Walking Dead.

Description from its Steam store page

ZERO Sievert

Now with over 600,000 copies sold, ZERO Sievert is a tense top-down extraction shooter that challenges you to scavenge a procedurally-generated wasteland, loot gear, and explore what’s left of a devastated world. When the odds are stacked against you, you’ll need to do more than just survive...

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

The Walking Dead: Saints & SinnersZERO Sievert
GamingPickz Score7.2/107.5/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (86%, 10,074)Very Positive (85%, 15,428)
Critic aggregateNo aggregate81/100
Price$9.99$19.99
Install size40 GB0.29 GB
Steam Deckunsupportedverified
Released20202024
DeveloperSkydance InteractiveCABO Studio

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners vs ZERO Sievert, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    The Walking Dead: Saints & SinnersFPS horror game
    ZERO SievertHorror open-world game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    The Walking Dead: Saints & SinnersZombies, Action, Gore
    ZERO SievertExtraction Shooter, Survival, Post-apocalyptic

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    The Walking Dead: Saints & SinnersScore 7.2 · 86% on Steam
    ZERO SievertScore 7.5 · 85% on Steam · 81 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners10,074 reviews · 1 add-on · 40 GB
    ZERO Sievert15,428 reviews · 0.29 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners$9.99
    ZERO Sievert$19.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    The Walking Dead: Saints & SinnersUnsupported
    ZERO SievertVerified

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

ZERO Sievert takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners and ZERO Sievert on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: ZERO Sievert (GamingPickz Score 7.5)
  • The cheaper right now: The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners ($9.99)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: ZERO Sievert (verified)
  • Lighter on storage: ZERO Sievert (0.29 GB)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

ActionAdventureSurvival HorrorShooterSurvivalSingleplayerIndieSimulation

Where they differ

The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners is also

VRZombiesGoreHorrorViolentRPG

ZERO Sievert is also

Extraction ShooterPost-apocalypticLooter ShooterTop-DownPixel GraphicsExploration

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. ZERO Sievert is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners and 1 for ZERO Sievert. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners and ZERO Sievert in scope?

The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners has drawn 10,074 Steam reviews, ships 1 add-on and installs in 40 GB. ZERO Sievert has drawn 15,428 Steam reviews and installs in 0.29 GB.

Is The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners or ZERO Sievert better?

By the GamingPickz Score, ZERO Sievert rates higher (7.5 to 7.2). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners or ZERO Sievert?

The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners is cheaper right now at $9.99, against $19.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each