Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction vs Watch_Dogs 2
Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction is an action game from Ubisoft Montreal (2010) while Watch_Dogs 2 is an FPS open-world game from Ubisoft (2016).
What each one is
Steam files Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction under Action and Stealth. In contrast, it files Watch_Dogs 2 under FPS and Open-World.
An investigation into his daughter’s death unwittingly leads former agent Sam Fisher to discover he’s been betrayed by his prior agency, the Third Echelon. Now a renegade, Fisher finds himself in a race against time to thwart a deadly terrorist plot that threatens millions.
Welcome to San Francisco. Play as Marcus, a brilliant young hacker, and join the most notorious hacker group, DedSec. Your objective: execute the biggest hack of history.
At a glance
| Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction | Watch_Dogs 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 6.7/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Steam rating | Mostly Positive (72%, 5,173) | Very Positive (82%, 101,514) |
| Critic aggregate | 83/100 | No aggregate |
| Price | Not listed | $49.99 |
| Install size | — | 27 GB |
| Steam Deck | playable | unsupported |
| Released | 2010 | 2016 |
| Developer | Ubisoft Montreal | Ubisoft |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction vs Watch_Dogs 2, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell ConvictionAction gameWatch_Dogs 2FPS open-world gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell ConvictionAction, Stealth, Co-opWatch_Dogs 2Open World, Hacking, IlluminatiThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell ConvictionScore 6.7 · 72% on Steam · 83 criticWatch_Dogs 2 ✓Score 7.5 · 82% on SteamThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction5,173 reviewsWatch_Dogs 2101,514 reviews · 30 add-ons · 27 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell ConvictionNot listedWatch_Dogs 2$49.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction ✓PlayableWatch_Dogs 2UnsupportedValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueTom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction and Watch_Dogs 2 on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Watch_Dogs 2 (GamingPickz Score 7.5)
- Better on a Steam Deck: Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction (playable)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: Watch_Dogs 2 (101,514 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
ActionStealthCo-opSingleplayerThird PersonMultiplayerThird-Person ShooterStory Rich
Where they differ
Open WorldHackingIlluminatiParkourCrimeAdventure
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Watch_Dogs 2 is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction | Watch_Dogs 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | — | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 with 2 GB |
| Minimum CPU | — | Intel Core i5 2400s @ 2.5 GHz, AMD FX 6120 @ 3.5 GHz |
| Minimum RAM | — | 6 GB |
| Install size | — | 27 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction · Watch_Dogs 2.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction and 1 for Watch_Dogs 2. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction and Watch_Dogs 2 in scope?
Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction has drawn 5,173 Steam reviews. Watch_Dogs 2 has drawn 101,514 Steam reviews, ships 30 add-ons and installs in 27 GB.
Is Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction or Watch_Dogs 2 better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Watch_Dogs 2 rates higher (7.5 to 6.7). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Conviction or Watch_Dogs 2?
One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.