Worms Armageddon vs Worms W.M.D
Worms Armageddon is a platformer strategy game from Team17 Digital Ltd (2013) while Worms W.M.D is a platformer strategy game from Team17 (2016).
What each one is
Steam files Worms Armageddon under Platformer and Strategy. In contrast, it files Worms W.M.D under Platformer and Strategy.
The iconic intrepid invertebrates return with a vengeance in the fan-favourite classic Worms™ Armageddon. Relive their glory days once again as you blast your way into enemy territory, sweep their fields and remain the last worm standing.
Join the fight and command your worm warriors into battle in the iconic 2D arcade artillery shooter where serious strategy and silly weaponry decide who swims or sinks.
At a glance
| Worms Armageddon | Worms W.M.D | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.8/10 | 7.4/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (94%, 10,914) | Very Positive (85%, 14,897) |
| Critic aggregate | No aggregate | 79/100 |
| Price | $2.99 | $29.99 |
| Install size | — | — |
| Steam Deck | verified | playable |
| Released | 2013 | 2016 |
| Developer | Team17 Digital Ltd | Team17 |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Worms Armageddon vs Worms W.M.D, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Worms ArmageddonPlatformer strategy gameWorms W.M.DPlatformer strategy gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Worms ArmageddonStrategy, Classic, Turn-BasedWorms W.M.DStrategy, Action, Turn-Based StrategyThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Worms Armageddon ✓Score 7.8 · 94% on SteamWorms W.M.DScore 7.4 · 85% on Steam · 79 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Worms Armageddon10,914 reviewsWorms W.M.D14,897 reviewsReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Worms Armageddon ✓$2.99Worms W.M.D$29.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Worms Armageddon ✓VerifiedWorms W.M.DPlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Worms Armageddon takes 3 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueWorms Armageddon and Worms W.M.D on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Worms Armageddon (GamingPickz Score 7.8)
- The cheaper right now: Worms Armageddon ($2.99)
- Better on a Steam Deck: Worms Armageddon (verified)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
StrategyMultiplayerClassicTurn-BasedTurn-Based StrategyFunny2DLocal Multiplayer
Where they differ
PhysicsParty1990'sRetroOnline Co-Op
ShooterMemesCasualWarGore
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Worms Armageddon is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Worms W.M.D is relaxed, easy to pick up.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Worms Armageddon and 1 for Worms W.M.D. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Worms Armageddon and Worms W.M.D in scope?
Worms Armageddon has drawn 10,914 Steam reviews. Worms W.M.D has drawn 14,897 Steam reviews.
Is Worms Armageddon or Worms W.M.D better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Worms Armageddon rates higher (7.8 to 7.4). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Worms Armageddon or Worms W.M.D?
Worms Armageddon is cheaper right now at $2.99, against $29.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.