GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Rivals of Aether vs ROUNDS

Rivals of Aether is a fighting platformer game from Aether Studios (2017) while ROUNDS is a fighting platformer game from Landfall (2021).

Rivals of Aether

2017 · Aether Studios

8.2GamingPickz Score

$29.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

ROUNDS

2021 · Landfall

8.2GamingPickz Score

$2.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

What each one is

Steam files Rivals of Aether under Fighting and Platformer. In contrast, it files ROUNDS under Fighting and Platformer.

Rivals of Aether

RIVALS OF AETHER is an indie fighting game where warring civilizations summon the power of Fire, Water, Air, and Earth. Play with up to four players either locally or online.

Description from its Steam store page

ROUNDS

Rounds is a 1v1 rogue-lite shooter where each round gets more intense. The losing player of each round unlocks clever upgrades to create a better build to counter their opponent.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Rivals of AetherROUNDS
GamingPickz Score8.2/108.2/10
Steam ratingOverwhelmingly Positive (96%, 38,134)Overwhelmingly Positive (95%, 44,331)
Critic aggregateNo aggregateNo aggregate
Price$29.99$2.99
Install size0.29 GB4 GB
Steam Deckverifiedplayable
Released20172021
DeveloperAether StudiosLandfall

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Rivals of Aether vs ROUNDS, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Rivals of AetherFighting platformer game
    ROUNDSFighting platformer game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Rivals of AetherFighting, 2D Fighter, Pixel Graphics
    ROUNDSFighting, Local Multiplayer, 2D Fighter

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Rivals of AetherScore 8.2 · 96% on Steam
    ROUNDSScore 8.2 · 95% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Rivals of Aether38,134 reviews · 21 add-ons · 0.29 GB
    ROUNDS44,331 reviews · 4 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Rivals of Aether$29.99
    ROUNDS$2.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Rivals of AetherVerified
    ROUNDSPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Rivals of Aether and ROUNDS on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The cheaper right now: ROUNDS ($2.99)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: Rivals of Aether (verified)
  • Lighter on storage: Rivals of Aether (0.29 GB)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

Fighting2D FighterMultiplayerIndieLocal MultiplayerPlatformer2DAction

Where they differ

Rivals of Aether is also

Pixel GraphicsCompetitiveGames WorkshopModdableGreat Soundtrack4 Player Local

ROUNDS is also

DeckbuildingRogue-litePhysicsCard BattlerPvPRoguelike Deckbuilder

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Rivals of Aether is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. ROUNDS is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Rivals of AetherROUNDS
Minimum GPUDirectX Compatible graphics card with at least 32MB of videoIntel Core i5-2400 @ 3.1 GHz
Minimum CPU1.2GHz processor2.5
Minimum RAM0.5 GB8 GB
Install size0.29 GB4 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Rivals of Aether · ROUNDS.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Rivals of Aether and 1 for ROUNDS. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Rivals of Aether and ROUNDS in scope?

Rivals of Aether has drawn 38,134 Steam reviews, ships 21 add-ons and installs in 0.29 GB. ROUNDS has drawn 44,331 Steam reviews and installs in 4 GB.

Is Rivals of Aether or ROUNDS better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Rivals of Aether rates higher (8.2 to 8.2). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Rivals of Aether or ROUNDS?

ROUNDS is cheaper right now at $2.99, against $29.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each