60 Seconds! vs Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden
60 Seconds! is a simulation strategy game from Robot Gentleman (2015) while Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden is a horror RPG game from The Bearded Ladies (2018).
What each one is
Steam files 60 Seconds! under Simulation and Strategy. In contrast, it files Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden under Horror and RPG.
60 Seconds! is a dark comedy atomic adventure of scavenge and survival. Collect supplies and rescue your family before the nuke hits. Stay alive in your fallout shelter. Make difficult decisions, ration food and hunt mutant cockroaches. And maybe survive. Or not.
A tactical game combining the turn-based combat of XCOM with story, exploration, stealth, and strategy. Take control of a team of Mutants navigating a post-human Earth. Created by a team including former HITMAN leads and the designer of PAYDAY.
At a glance
| 60 Seconds! | Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.2/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (85%, 11,687) | Very Positive (90%, 20,534) |
| Critic aggregate | No aggregate | 78/100 |
| Price | $8.99 | $34.99 |
| Install size | 3 GB | 8 GB |
| Steam Deck | unsupported | playable |
| Released | 2015 | 2018 |
| Developer | Robot Gentleman | The Bearded Ladies |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
60 Seconds! vs Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
60 Seconds!Simulation strategy gameMutant Year Zero: Road to EdenHorror RPG gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
60 Seconds!Turn-Based Tactics, Exploration, Choose Your Own AdventureMutant Year Zero: Road to EdenStrategy, RPG, Turn-Based CombatThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
60 Seconds!Score 7.2 · 85% on SteamMutant Year Zero: Road to Eden ✓Score 7.7 · 90% on Steam · 78 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
60 Seconds!11,687 reviews · 3 GBMutant Year Zero: Road to Eden20,534 reviews · 2 add-ons · 8 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
60 Seconds! ✓$8.99Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden$34.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
60 Seconds!UnsupportedMutant Year Zero: Road to Eden ✓PlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogue60 Seconds! and Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden (GamingPickz Score 7.7)
- The cheaper right now: 60 Seconds! ($8.99)
- Better on a Steam Deck: Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden (playable)
- Lighter on storage: 60 Seconds! (3 GB)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
Turn-Based TacticsExplorationDifficultStrategyPost-apocalypticFunnySurvival
Where they differ
Choose Your Own AdventureOutbreak SimImmersive SimWrestlingPoint & Click2D
RPGTurn-Based CombatTacticalTurn-BasedAdventureStealth
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, 60 Seconds! is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden is demanding, for players who want a challenge.
System requirements, side by side
| 60 Seconds! | Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | — | NVidia GTX 580 / AMD Radeon HD 7870 |
| Minimum CPU | — | Intel Core i5-760 / AMD Phenom II X4 965 |
| Minimum RAM | — | 6 GB |
| Install size | 3 GB | 8 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: 60 Seconds! · Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for 60 Seconds! and 1 for Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are 60 Seconds! and Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden in scope?
60 Seconds! has drawn 11,687 Steam reviews and installs in 3 GB. Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden has drawn 20,534 Steam reviews, ships 2 add-ons and installs in 8 GB.
Is 60 Seconds! or Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden rates higher (7.7 to 7.2). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, 60 Seconds! or Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden?
60 Seconds! is cheaper right now at $8.99, against $34.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.