GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Abiotic Factor vs Scrap Mechanic

Abiotic Factor is an FPS RPG game from Deep Field Games (2025) while Scrap Mechanic is an open-world sandbox game from Axolot Games (2026).

Abiotic Factor

2025 · Deep Field Games

8.3GamingPickz Score

$34.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

Scrap Mechanic

2026 · Axolot Games

8.2GamingPickz Score

$28.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Abiotic Factor under FPS and RPG. In contrast, it files Scrap Mechanic under Open-World and Sandbox.

Abiotic Factor

Abiotic Factor is a survival crafting experience for 1-6 players set in the depths of an underground research facility. Caught between paranormal containment failure, a military crusade, and chaos from a dozen realms, the world’s greatest minds must survive against the universe’s biggest threats.

Description from its Steam store page

Scrap Mechanic

Enter the creative paradise of Scrap Mechanic! Build fantastic machines, go on adventures with your friends and defend against waves of evil Farmbots in this imaginative multiplayer survival sandbox. With Scrap Mechanic’s powerful creation tools you can engineer your own adventures!

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Abiotic FactorScrap Mechanic
GamingPickz Score8.3/108.2/10
Steam ratingOverwhelmingly Positive (96%, 58,569)Very Positive (92%, 122,335)
Critic aggregateNo aggregateNo aggregate
Price$34.99$28.99
Install size10 GB30 GB
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20252026
DeveloperDeep Field GamesAxolot Games

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Abiotic Factor vs Scrap Mechanic, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Abiotic FactorFPS RPG game
    Scrap MechanicOpen-world sandbox game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Abiotic FactorSurvival, Online Co-Op, Open World Survival Craft
    Scrap MechanicBuilding, Sandbox, Survival

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Abiotic FactorScore 8.3 · 96% on Steam
    Scrap MechanicScore 8.2 · 92% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Abiotic Factor58,569 reviews · 3 add-ons · 10 GB
    Scrap Mechanic122,335 reviews · 2 add-ons · 30 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Abiotic Factor$34.99
    Scrap Mechanic$28.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Abiotic FactorPlayable
    Scrap MechanicPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Abiotic Factor and Scrap Mechanic on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Abiotic Factor (GamingPickz Score 8.3)
  • The cheaper right now: Scrap Mechanic ($28.99)
  • Lighter on storage: Abiotic Factor (10 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Scrap Mechanic (122,335 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

SurvivalOnline Co-OpCraftingBase-BuildingEarly AccessMultiplayerSandboxFirst-Person

Where they differ

Abiotic Factor is also

Open World Survival CraftSci-fiCo-op CampaignExplorationFPSScience

Scrap Mechanic is also

Open WorldPhysicsCo-opSingleplayerThird PersonFunny

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Abiotic Factor is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Scrap Mechanic is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Abiotic FactorScrap Mechanic
Minimum GPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics
Minimum CPUIntel Core i5-1235U
Minimum RAM8 GB
Install size10 GB30 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Abiotic Factor · Scrap Mechanic.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 9 accessibility features for Abiotic Factor and 0 for Scrap Mechanic. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Abiotic Factor and Scrap Mechanic in scope?

Abiotic Factor has drawn 58,569 Steam reviews, ships 3 add-ons and installs in 10 GB. Scrap Mechanic has drawn 122,335 Steam reviews, ships 2 add-ons and installs in 30 GB.

Is Abiotic Factor or Scrap Mechanic better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Abiotic Factor rates higher (8.3 to 8.2). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Abiotic Factor or Scrap Mechanic?

Scrap Mechanic is cheaper right now at $28.99, against $34.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each