GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Age of Wonders 4 vs Solasta: Crown of the Magister

Age of Wonders 4 is an RPG strategy game from Triumph Studios (2023) while Solasta: Crown of the Magister is an RPG strategy game from Tactical Adventures (2021).

Age of Wonders 4

2023 · Triumph Studios

7.1GamingPickz Score

$49.99

Steam: Very Positive

Solasta: Crown of the Magister

2021 · Tactical Adventures

7.5GamingPickz Score

$29.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Age of Wonders 4 under RPG and Strategy. In contrast, it files Solasta: Crown of the Magister under RPG and Strategy.

Age of Wonders 4

Rule a fantasy realm of your own design! Explore new magical realms in Age of Wonders’ signature blend of 4X strategy and turn-based tactical combat. Control a faction that grows and changes as you expand your empire with each turn!

Description from its Steam store page

Solasta: Crown of the Magister

Roll for initiative, take attacks of opportunity, manage player location and the verticality of the battle field in this Turn-Based Tactical RPG based on the SRD 5.1 Ruleset. In Solasta, you make the choices, dice decide your destiny.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Age of Wonders 4Solasta: Crown of the Magister
GamingPickz Score7.1/107.5/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (81%, 22,976)Very Positive (87%, 22,449)
Critic aggregateNo aggregateNo aggregate
Price$49.99$29.99
Install size35 GB30 GB
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20232021
DeveloperTriumph StudiosTactical Adventures

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Age of Wonders 4 vs Solasta: Crown of the Magister, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Age of Wonders 4RPG strategy game
    Solasta: Crown of the MagisterRPG strategy game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Age of Wonders 4Strategy, 4X, Character Customization
    Solasta: Crown of the MagisterRPG, Co-op Campaign, Character Customization

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Age of Wonders 4Score 7.1 · 81% on Steam
    Solasta: Crown of the MagisterScore 7.5 · 87% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Age of Wonders 422,976 reviews · 14 add-ons · 35 GB
    Solasta: Crown of the Magister22,449 reviews · 6 add-ons · 30 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Age of Wonders 4$49.99
    Solasta: Crown of the Magister$29.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Age of Wonders 4Playable
    Solasta: Crown of the MagisterPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Solasta: Crown of the Magister takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Age of Wonders 4 and Solasta: Crown of the Magister on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Solasta: Crown of the Magister (GamingPickz Score 7.5)
  • The cheaper right now: Solasta: Crown of the Magister ($29.99)
  • Lighter on storage: Solasta: Crown of the Magister (30 GB)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

StrategyCharacter CustomizationFantasyRPGStrategy RPGChoices MatterCombatSingleplayer

Where they differ

Age of Wonders 4 is also

4XTurn-Based StrategyModdableDwarfLore-RichGrand Strategy

Solasta: Crown of the Magister is also

Co-op CampaignTurn-Based CombatDungeons & DragonsCRPGStory RichAdventure

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Age of Wonders 4 is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Solasta: Crown of the Magister is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 8 accessibility features for Age of Wonders 4 and 9 for Solasta: Crown of the Magister. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Age of Wonders 4 and Solasta: Crown of the Magister in scope?

Age of Wonders 4 has drawn 22,976 Steam reviews, ships 14 add-ons and installs in 35 GB. Solasta: Crown of the Magister has drawn 22,449 Steam reviews, ships 6 add-ons and installs in 30 GB.

Is Age of Wonders 4 or Solasta: Crown of the Magister better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Solasta: Crown of the Magister rates higher (7.5 to 7.1). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Age of Wonders 4 or Solasta: Crown of the Magister?

Solasta: Crown of the Magister is cheaper right now at $29.99, against $49.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each