Alice: Madness Returns vs Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate
Alice: Madness Returns is an action-adventure horror game from Spicy Horse (2011) while Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate is a horror platformer game (2013).
What each one is
Steam files Alice: Madness Returns under Action-Adventure and Horror. In contrast, it files Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate under Horror and Platformer.
Alice: Madness Returns is a third-person, single-player, action adventure platformer. Visit the grim reality of Victorian London and travel to the beautiful yet ghastly Wonderland to uncover the root of Alice's madness.
This sequel to Castlevania: Lords of Shadow reveals the story of the Belmonts as they battle destiny across generations to discover their true fate. Trevor Belmont, knight of the Brotherhood of Light, embarks on an epic quest to avenge his mother who was killed by his father Gabriel.
At a glance
| Alice: Madness Returns | Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.7/10 | 6.6/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (91%, 30,764) | Very Positive (84%, 2,695) |
| Critic aggregate | 75/100 | No aggregate |
| Price | $9.99 | $14.99 |
| Install size | — | 2 GB |
| Steam Deck | playable | verified |
| Released | 2011 | 2013 |
| Developer | Spicy Horse | — |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Alice: Madness Returns vs Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Alice: Madness ReturnsAction-adventure horror gameCastlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of FateHorror platformer gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Alice: Madness ReturnsHorror, Female Protagonist, Dark FantasyCastlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of FateAction, Adventure, MetroidvaniaThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Alice: Madness Returns ✓Score 7.7 · 91% on Steam · 75 criticCastlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of FateScore 6.6 · 84% on SteamThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Alice: Madness Returns30,764 reviewsCastlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate2,695 reviews · 2 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Alice: Madness Returns ✓$9.99Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate$14.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Alice: Madness ReturnsPlayableCastlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate ✓VerifiedValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Alice: Madness Returns takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueAlice: Madness Returns and Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- Multi-platform
- Nintendo
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Alice: Madness Returns (GamingPickz Score 7.7)
- The cheaper right now: Alice: Madness Returns ($9.99)
- Better on a Steam Deck: Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate (verified)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: Alice: Madness Returns (30,764 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
HorrorDark FantasyHack and SlashGothicSingleplayerPlatformerFantasyAction
Where they differ
Female Protagonist3D PlatformerAction-AdventureStory RichPsychologicalSurreal
MetroidvaniaVampire2DSide Scroller2.5DDark
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Alice: Madness Returns is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Alice: Madness Returns and 1 for Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Alice: Madness Returns and Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate in scope?
Alice: Madness Returns has drawn 30,764 Steam reviews. Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate has drawn 2,695 Steam reviews and installs in 2 GB.
Is Alice: Madness Returns or Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Alice: Madness Returns rates higher (7.7 to 6.6). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Alice: Madness Returns or Castlevania: Lords of Shadow – Mirror of Fate?
Alice: Madness Returns is cheaper right now at $9.99, against $14.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.