GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Anno 1800 vs Crusader Kings III

Anno 1800 is a sandbox simulation game from Ubisoft Mainz (2019) while Crusader Kings III is an RPG sandbox game from Development Studio (2020).

Anno 1800

2019 · Ubisoft Mainz

7.4GamingPickz Score

$59.99

Steam: Very Positive

Crusader Kings III

2020 · Development Studio

8.1GamingPickz Score

$49.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Anno 1800 under Sandbox and Simulation. In contrast, it files Crusader Kings III under RPG and Sandbox.

Anno 1800

Anno 1800™ – Lead the Industrial Revolution! Welcome to the dawn of the Industrial Age. The path you choose will define your world. Are you an innovator or an exploiter? A conqueror or a liberator? How the world remembers your name is up to you.

Description from its Steam store page

Crusader Kings III

Love, fight, scheme, and claim greatness. Determine your noble house’s legacy in the sprawling grand strategy of Crusader Kings III. Death is only the beginning as you guide your dynasty’s bloodline in the rich and larger-than-life simulation of the Middle Ages.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Anno 1800Crusader Kings III
GamingPickz Score7.4/108.1/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (81%, 32,232)Very Positive (90%, 143,235)
Critic aggregate81/10091/100
Price$59.99$49.99
Install size60 GB20 GB
Steam Deckunsupportedplayable
Released20192020
DeveloperUbisoft MainzDevelopment Studio

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Anno 1800 vs Crusader Kings III, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Anno 1800Sandbox simulation game
    Crusader Kings IIIRPG sandbox game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Anno 1800City Builder, Strategy, Simulation
    Crusader Kings IIIStrategy, Medieval, Grand Strategy

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Anno 1800Score 7.4 · 81% on Steam · 81 critic
    Crusader Kings IIIScore 8.1 · 90% on Steam · 91 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Anno 180032,232 reviews · 35 add-ons · 60 GB
    Crusader Kings III143,235 reviews · 33 add-ons · 20 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Anno 1800$59.99
    Crusader Kings III$49.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Anno 1800Unsupported
    Crusader Kings IIIPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Crusader Kings III takes 3 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Anno 1800 and Crusader Kings III on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • Multi-platform
  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Crusader Kings III (GamingPickz Score 8.1)
  • The cheaper right now: Crusader Kings III ($49.99)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: Crusader Kings III (playable)
  • Lighter on storage: Crusader Kings III (20 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Crusader Kings III (143,235 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

StrategySimulationEconomyMultiplayerSandboxRTSSingleplayerManagement

Where they differ

Anno 1800 is also

City BuilderResource ManagementCo-opExplorationBuildingPolitics

Crusader Kings III is also

MedievalGrand StrategyRPGCharacter CustomizationLife SimWar

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Anno 1800 is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Crusader Kings III is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Anno 1800Crusader Kings III
Minimum GPUNVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Minimum CPUIntel Core i5-750
Minimum RAM8 GB
Install size60 GB20 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Anno 1800 · Crusader Kings III.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Anno 1800 and 6 for Crusader Kings III. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Anno 1800 and Crusader Kings III in scope?

Anno 1800 has drawn 32,232 Steam reviews, ships 35 add-ons and installs in 60 GB. Crusader Kings III has drawn 143,235 Steam reviews, ships 33 add-ons and installs in 20 GB.

Is Anno 1800 or Crusader Kings III better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Crusader Kings III rates higher (8.1 to 7.4). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Anno 1800 or Crusader Kings III?

Crusader Kings III is cheaper right now at $49.99, against $59.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each