GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

ArcheAge vs Might & Magic: Heroes VI

ArcheAge is a mmorpg open-world game from XLGAMES (2015) while Might & Magic: Heroes VI is an RPG strategy game from Blackhole (2011).

Quick answer: ArcheAge rates higher, 5.7 to 5.4 on the GamingPickz Score.

ArcheAge

2015 · XLGAMES

5.7GamingPickz Score

Not listed

Steam: Mixed

Might & Magic: Heroes VI

2011 · Blackhole

5.4GamingPickz Score

$9.99

Steam: Mixed

What each one is

ArcheAge is filed under Mmorpg and Open-World. In contrast, Might & Magic: Heroes VI under RPG and Strategy.

ArcheAge

Play ArcheAge - A vast open-world sandbox MMORPG with everything you can possibly imagine.

Description from its Steam store page

Might & Magic: Heroes VI

Heroes VI is a fast-paced epic story where Angels plot to end -- once and for all -- an unfinished war with their ancient rivals, the Faceless.

Description from its Steam store page

Story, characters and reception

ArcheAge
Reception

Reception ArcheAge has received generally favorable reviews from critics, holding a score of 80 out of 100 on Metacritic based on 11 critic reviews. ^ "ArcheAge for PC Reviews" . Metacritic . (Wikipedia)

Might & Magic: Heroes VI
Plot

Setting Heroes VI takes place on the continent of Thallan in the fictional world of Ashan, a setting developed by Ubisoft between 2004 and 2008 for use in all of its Might and Magic -related projects, starting with Heroes of Might and Magic V in 2006. Ashan is populated by approximately eleven factions inspired by those appearing in previous Heroes games and real-life cultures, five of which are showcased in Heroes VI . Many of those factions have… (Wikipedia)

Reception

Might Magic Heroes VI Might Magic Heroes VI Initially, the game was plagued with numerous in-game crashes, lock-ups, errors, and bugs; poor artificial intelligence; significant faction/hero/creature imbalance; and the usage of DRM. The game has been updated with several patches, bringing the version to 2. 1. (Wikipedia)

At a glance

ArcheAgeMight & Magic: Heroes VI
GamingPickz Score5.7/105.4/10
Steam ratingMixed (52%, 7,338)Mixed (48%, 9,256)
Critic aggregate80/10077/100
PriceNot listed$9.99
Install size70 GB
Steam DeckUntestedplayable
Released20152011
DeveloperXLGAMESBlackhole

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

ArcheAge vs Might & Magic: Heroes VI, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    ArcheAgeMmorpg open-world game
    Might & Magic: Heroes VIRPG strategy game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    ArcheAgeMassively Multiplayer, Free to Play, MMORPG
    Might & Magic: Heroes VIStrategy, Turn-Based Strategy, RPG

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    ArcheAgeScore 5.7 · 52% on Steam · 80 critic
    Might & Magic: Heroes VIScore 5.4 · 48% on Steam · 77 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    ArcheAge7,338 reviews · 70 GB
    Might & Magic: Heroes VI9,256 reviews

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    ArcheAgeNot listed
    Might & Magic: Heroes VI$9.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

ArcheAge takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

ArcheAge and Might & Magic: Heroes VI on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularityMight & Magic: Heroes VI

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: ArcheAge (GamingPickz Score 5.7)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

RPGFantasyAdventureMultiplayer

Where they differ

ArcheAge is also

Massively MultiplayerFree to PlayMMORPGOpen WorldSandboxPvP

Might & Magic: Heroes VI is also

StrategyTurn-Based StrategyTurn-BasedSingleplayerTacticalBase-Building

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, ArcheAge is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Might & Magic: Heroes VI is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

ArcheAgeMight & Magic: Heroes VI
Minimum GPUNVIDIA GeForce 8000 series 512MB / AMD Radeon HD 4000 series 512MB512 MB
Minimum CPUIntel Core2 DuoIntel Pentium Core 2 Duo E4400 @ 2.0 Ghz, AMD Athlon X2 5000+ @ 2.6 Ghz
Minimum RAM2 GB1 GB
Install size70 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: ArcheAge · Might & Magic: Heroes VI.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for ArcheAge and 0 for Might & Magic: Heroes VI. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are ArcheAge and Might & Magic: Heroes VI in scope?

ArcheAge has drawn 7,338 Steam reviews and installs in 70 GB. Might & Magic: Heroes VI has drawn 9,256 Steam reviews.

Is ArcheAge or Might & Magic: Heroes VI better?

By the GamingPickz Score, ArcheAge rates higher (5.7 to 5.4). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, ArcheAge or Might & Magic: Heroes VI?

One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.

Should I get ArcheAge or Might & Magic: Heroes VI?

ArcheAge rates higher, 5.7 to 5.4 on the GamingPickz Score. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each