ArcheAge vs Yakuza 0
ArcheAge is a mmorpg open-world game from XLGAMES (2015) while Yakuza 0 is a JRPG open-world game from Ryu Ga Gotoku Studio (2018).
Quick answer: Yakuza 0 rates higher, 8.4 to 5.7 on the GamingPickz Score.
What each one is
ArcheAge is filed under Mmorpg and Open-World. In contrast, Yakuza 0 under JRPG and Open-World.
Play ArcheAge - A vast open-world sandbox MMORPG with everything you can possibly imagine.
SEGA’s legendary Japanese series finally comes to PC. Fight like hell through Tokyo and Osaka as junior yakuza Kiryu and Majima. Take a front row seat to 1980s life in Japan in an experience unlike anything else in video gaming, with uncapped framerates and 4K resolutions. A legend is born.
Story, characters and reception
Reception
Reception ArcheAge has received generally favorable reviews from critics, holding a score of 80 out of 100 on Metacritic based on 11 critic reviews. ^ "ArcheAge for PC Reviews" . Metacritic . (Wikipedia)
Plot
Characters and settings Yakuza 0 takes place from December 1988 to January 1989, during the bubble era of Japan, in which real estate and stock market prices were greatly inflated. The two central protagonists of the game are Kazuma Kiryu ( Takaya Kuroda / Yong Yea ), a junior Tojo Clan yakuza in Kamurochō who is forced out of the clan due to a murder accusation, and Goro Majima ( Hidenari Ugaki / Matthew Mercer ), a disgraced former Tojo Clan yakuza who… (Wikipedia)
Characters
Yakuza 0 takes place from December 1988 to January 1989, during the bubble era of Japan, in which real estate and stock market prices were greatly inflated. The two central protagonists of the game are Kazuma Kiryu ( Takaya Kuroda / Yong Yea ), a junior Tojo Clan yakuza in Kamurochō who is forced out of the clan due to a murder accusation, and Goro Majima ( Hidenari Ugaki / Matthew Mercer ), a disgraced former Tojo Clan yakuza who works as a cabaret… (Wikipedia)
Reception
Critical response Reception Yakuza 0 received "generally favorable" reviews from critics, with the Xbox One version receiving "universal acclaim", according to review aggregator Metacritic . Of 153 critic reviews on review aggregator OpenCritic , 95% have recommended Yakuza 0 , with a top critic average of 86/100. PlayStation LifeStyle s review of the import version was a 9/10, calling it the best in the series and "the result of 10 years spent not just… (Wikipedia)
At a glance
| ArcheAge | Yakuza 0 | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 5.7/10 | 8.4/10 |
| Steam rating | Mixed (52%, 7,338) | Overwhelmingly Positive (95%, 77,742) |
| Critic aggregate | 80/100 | 86/100 |
| Price | Not listed | Not listed |
| Install size | 70 GB | — |
| Steam Deck | Untested | verified |
| Released | 2015 | 2018 |
| Developer | XLGAMES | Ryu Ga Gotoku Studio |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
ArcheAge vs Yakuza 0, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
ArcheAgeMmorpg open-world gameYakuza 0JRPG open-world gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
ArcheAgeMassively Multiplayer, Free to Play, MMORPGYakuza 0Story Rich, Action, Beat 'em upThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
ArcheAgeScore 5.7 · 52% on Steam · 80 criticYakuza 0 ✓Score 8.4 · 95% on Steam · 86 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
ArcheAge7,338 reviews · 70 GBYakuza 077,742 reviewsReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
ArcheAgeNot listedYakuza 0Not listedRead live from Steam and subject to change.
Yakuza 0 takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueArcheAge and Yakuza 0 on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Yakuza 0 (GamingPickz Score 8.4)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: Yakuza 0 (77,742 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
Open WorldRPGAdventureActionThird Person
Where they differ
Massively MultiplayerFree to PlayMMORPGSandboxFantasyPvP
Story RichBeat 'em upGreat SoundtrackCrimeMinigamesFunny
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, ArcheAge is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Yakuza 0 is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| ArcheAge | Yakuza 0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | NVIDIA GeForce 8000 series 512MB / AMD Radeon HD 4000 series 512MB | Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 |
| Minimum CPU | Intel Core2 Duo | Intel Core i5-3470 |
| Minimum RAM | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Install size | 70 GB | — |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: ArcheAge · Yakuza 0.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for ArcheAge and 1 for Yakuza 0. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are ArcheAge and Yakuza 0 in scope?
ArcheAge has drawn 7,338 Steam reviews and installs in 70 GB. Yakuza 0 has drawn 77,742 Steam reviews.
Is ArcheAge or Yakuza 0 better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Yakuza 0 rates higher (8.4 to 5.7). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, ArcheAge or Yakuza 0?
One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.
Should I get ArcheAge or Yakuza 0?
Yakuza 0 rates higher, 8.4 to 5.7 on the GamingPickz Score. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.