GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Argo vs ARMA 3

Argo is an FPS open-world game from Bohemia Interactive (2017) while ARMA 3 is an FPS open-world game from Bohemia Interactive (2013).

Argo

2017 · Bohemia Interactive

5.0GamingPickz Score

Not listed

Steam: Mixed

ARMA 3

2013 · Bohemia Interactive

7.7GamingPickz Score

$29.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Argo under FPS and Open-World. In contrast, it files ARMA 3 under FPS and Open-World.

Argo

Jump straight into combat in this official standalone FREE total conversion of Arma 3. Argo is a hardcore tactical first-person shooter, in which you fight across unrestricted terrain, and where a single bullet is all it takes. Master your craft to rank up and become (in)famous on the battlefield.

Description from its Steam store page

ARMA 3

Experience true combat gameplay in a massive military sandbox. Deploy with a wide variety of single- and multiplayer content, a massive arsenal of modern weapons and vehicles, and limitless opportunities for content creation. Authentic, diverse, open - Arma 3 sends you to war.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

ArgoARMA 3
GamingPickz Score5.0/107.7/10
Steam ratingMixed (51%, 10,824)Very Positive (90%, 294,969)
Critic aggregateNo aggregate74/100
PriceNot listed$29.99
Install size20 GB
Steam Deckunsupportedplayable
Released20172013
DeveloperBohemia InteractiveBohemia Interactive

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Argo vs ARMA 3, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    ArgoFPS open-world game
    ARMA 3FPS open-world game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    ArgoFree to Play, Shooter, FPS
    ARMA 3Military, Action, Shooter

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    ArgoScore 5.0 · 51% on Steam
    ARMA 3Score 7.7 · 90% on Steam · 74 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Argo10,824 reviews · 20 GB
    ARMA 3294,969 reviews · 22 add-ons

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    ArgoNot listed
    ARMA 3$29.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    ArgoUnsupported
    ARMA 3Playable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

ARMA 3 takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Argo and ARMA 3 on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: ARMA 3 (GamingPickz Score 7.7)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: ARMA 3 (playable)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: ARMA 3 (294,969 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

ShooterFPSMultiplayerActionOpen WorldTacticalWarFirst-Person

Where they differ

Argo is also

Free to PlayViolentMassively MultiplayerModAtmospheric

ARMA 3 is also

SandboxModdableCombatTeam-BasedThird-Person Shooter

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Argo is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. ARMA 3 is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

ArgoARMA 3
Minimum GPUNVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Minimum CPUIntel Core quad-core
Minimum RAM8 GB
Install size20 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Argo · ARMA 3.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Argo and 0 for ARMA 3. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Argo and ARMA 3 in scope?

Argo has drawn 10,824 Steam reviews and installs in 20 GB. ARMA 3 has drawn 294,969 Steam reviews and ships 22 add-ons.

Is Argo or ARMA 3 better?

By the GamingPickz Score, ARMA 3 rates higher (7.7 to 5.0). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Argo or ARMA 3?

One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each