GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

ARK: Survival Evolved vs EverQuest II

ARK: Survival Evolved is a mmorpg open-world game from Studio Wildcard (2017) while EverQuest II is a mmorpg open-world game from Darkpaw Games (2011).

Quick answer: ARK: Survival Evolved rates higher, 7.8 to 7.0 on the GamingPickz Score, and EverQuest II is the cheaper at Free.

ARK: Survival Evolved

2017 · Studio Wildcard

7.8GamingPickz Score

$9.89

Steam: Very Positive

EverQuest II

2011 · Darkpaw Games

7.0GamingPickz Score

Free

Steam: Mostly Positive

What each one is

ARK: Survival Evolved is filed under Mmorpg and Open-World. In contrast, EverQuest II under Mmorpg and Open-World.

ARK: Survival Evolved

Stranded on the shores of a mysterious island, you must learn to survive. Use your cunning to kill or tame the primeval creatures roaming the land, and encounter other players to survive, dominate... and escape!

Description from its Steam store page

EverQuest II

EverQuest® II is a deep fantasy MMORPG with over two decades of content, a thriving world, and ongoing expansions that keep Norrath growing. Create your hero and adventure through a massively rich, ever-evolving universe.

Description from its Steam store page

Story, characters and reception

ARK: Survival Evolved
Reception

Reception Ark: Survival Evolved received "mixed or average" reviews for the Windows, PlayStation 4, and Xbox One versions, while the Switch version received "generally unfavorable" reviews, according to review aggregator website Metacritic . TJ Hafer's 7. 7/10 review on IGN stated that "When I'm having a good time in Ark , I'm having a really good time. (Wikipedia)

EverQuest II
Reception

Reception EverQuest II had mostly positive reception from critics, earning an 83 out of 100 average score from aggregate review website Metacritic . Many reviewers compared the title to the original EverQuest , which was viewed as one of the best and most influential examples of the genre. Greg Kasavin of GameSpot said that EverQuest II isn't the massive step for the genre that its predecessor was, but it can still be a fun and addictive online… (Wikipedia)

At a glance

ARK: Survival EvolvedEverQuest II
GamingPickz Score7.8/107.0/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (83%, 776,582)Mostly Positive (79%, 2,934)
Critic aggregate70/10083/100
Price$9.89Free
Install size60 GB
Steam Deckverifiedplayable
Released20172011
DeveloperStudio WildcardDarkpaw Games

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

ARK: Survival Evolved vs EverQuest II, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    ARK: Survival EvolvedMmorpg open-world game
    EverQuest IIMmorpg open-world game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    ARK: Survival EvolvedOpen World Survival Craft, Survival, Open World
    EverQuest IIFree to Play, RPG, Massively Multiplayer

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    ARK: Survival EvolvedScore 7.8 · 83% on Steam · 70 critic
    EverQuest IIScore 7.0 · 79% on Steam · 83 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    ARK: Survival Evolved776,582 reviews · 18 add-ons · 60 GB
    EverQuest II2,934 reviews · 3 add-ons

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    ARK: Survival Evolved$9.89
    EverQuest IIFree

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    ARK: Survival EvolvedVerified
    EverQuest IIPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

ARK: Survival Evolved takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

ARK: Survival Evolved and EverQuest II on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: ARK: Survival Evolved (GamingPickz Score 7.8)
  • The cheaper right now: EverQuest II (Free)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: ARK: Survival Evolved (verified)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: ARK: Survival Evolved (776,582 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

MultiplayerOpen WorldCraftingAdventureActionSandboxFirst-PersonMassively Multiplayer

Where they differ

ARK: Survival Evolved is also

Open World Survival CraftSurvivalDinosaursBuildingBase-BuildingCo-op

EverQuest II is also

Free to PlayMMORPGFantasyExplorationCharacter CustomizationDwarf

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, ARK: Survival Evolved is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. EverQuest II is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

ARK: Survival EvolvedEverQuest II
Minimum GPUNVIDIA GTX 670 2GB/AMD Radeon HD 7870 2GB
Minimum CPUIntel Core i5-2400/AMD FX-8320
Minimum RAM8 GB
Install size60 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: ARK: Survival Evolved · EverQuest II.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for ARK: Survival Evolved and 0 for EverQuest II. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are ARK: Survival Evolved and EverQuest II in scope?

ARK: Survival Evolved has drawn 776,582 Steam reviews, ships 18 add-ons and installs in 60 GB. EverQuest II has drawn 2,934 Steam reviews and ships 3 add-ons.

Is ARK: Survival Evolved or EverQuest II better?

By the GamingPickz Score, ARK: Survival Evolved rates higher (7.8 to 7.0). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, ARK: Survival Evolved or EverQuest II?

EverQuest II is cheaper right now at Free, against $9.89. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Should I get ARK: Survival Evolved or EverQuest II?

ARK: Survival Evolved rates higher, 7.8 to 7.0 on the GamingPickz Score, and EverQuest II is the cheaper at Free. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each