Armored Warfare vs World of Tanks
Armored Warfare is a mmorpg simulation game from Obsidian Entertainment (2017) while World of Tanks is a simulation mmorpg game from Wargaming (2010).
What each one is
Steam files Armored Warfare under Mmorpg and Simulation. In contrast, it files World of Tanks under Simulation and Mmorpg.
Wage war against players from around the world with an unstoppable arsenal of 300+ powerful armored combat vehicles. Compete in PvP tank combat, complete co-op missions, and crush your enemies on breathtaking maps, from scorching deserts to neon-drenched urban jungles.
World of Tanks is a tactical action game with very different gameplay depending on the vehicle type and role. Aside from regular PvP, there are competitive and clan-based modes, special PvE and PvPvE events, and much more. Whether you play to dominate or just enjoy the ride, you'll fit right in.
At a glance
| Armored Warfare | World of Tanks | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 5.6/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Steam rating | Mixed (63%, 5,372) | Very Positive (80%, 100,753) |
| Critic aggregate | No aggregate | 80/100 |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Install size | 34 GB | 120 GB |
| Steam Deck | playable | playable |
| Released | 2017 | 2010 |
| Developer | Obsidian Entertainment | Wargaming |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Armored Warfare vs World of Tanks, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Armored WarfareMmorpg simulation gameWorld of TanksSimulation mmorpg gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Armored WarfareRealistic, Shooter, Alternate HistoryWorld of TanksTanks, Free to Play, ActionThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Armored WarfareScore 5.6 · 63% on SteamWorld of Tanks ✓Score 7.5 · 80% on Steam · 80 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Armored Warfare5,372 reviews · 4 add-ons · 34 GBWorld of Tanks100,753 reviews · 32 add-ons · 120 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Armored WarfareFreeWorld of TanksFreeRead live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Armored WarfarePlayableWorld of TanksPlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
World of Tanks takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueArmored Warfare and World of Tanks on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- Mobile
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: World of Tanks (GamingPickz Score 7.5)
- Lighter on storage: Armored Warfare (34 GB)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: World of Tanks (100,753 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
RealisticShooterWarFree to PlayTanksPvEVehicular CombatAction
Where they differ
Alternate HistoryOnline Co-OpStrategyCapitalismDestructionModern
MultiplayerMassively MultiplayerHistoricalWorld War IISimulationCo-op
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Armored Warfare is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. World of Tanks is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Armored Warfare | World of Tanks | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | — | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 / AMD Radeon R9 270 |
| Minimum CPU | — | Intel Core i5-3330 / AMD FX-6300 |
| Minimum RAM | — | 8 GB |
| Install size | 34 GB | 120 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Armored Warfare · World of Tanks.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Armored Warfare and 5 for World of Tanks. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Armored Warfare and World of Tanks in scope?
Armored Warfare has drawn 5,372 Steam reviews, ships 4 add-ons and installs in 34 GB. World of Tanks has drawn 100,753 Steam reviews, ships 32 add-ons and installs in 120 GB.
Is Armored Warfare or World of Tanks better?
By the GamingPickz Score, World of Tanks rates higher (7.5 to 5.6). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Armored Warfare or World of Tanks?
Armored Warfare is cheaper right now at Free, against Free. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.