GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

ASKA vs Satisfactory

ASKA is an action-adventure action-RPG game from Sand Sailor Studio (2024) while Satisfactory is an open-world sandbox game from Coffee Stain Studios (2024).

ASKA

2024 · Sand Sailor Studio

6.9GamingPickz Score

$24.99

Steam: Very Positive

Satisfactory

2024 · Coffee Stain Studios

8.8GamingPickz Score

$39.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

What each one is

Steam files ASKA under Action-Adventure and Action-RPG. In contrast, it files Satisfactory under Open-World and Sandbox.

ASKA

A new Viking age dawns with you at its helm. Forge a thriving colony from nothing in this mythic open-world survival sim. Earn the gods' favor and survive in a land ruled by ancient terrors and unforgiving seasons. Rally unique villagers, expand your settlement and defend your tribe - solo or co-op!

Description from its Steam store page

Satisfactory

Satisfactory is a first-person open-world factory building game with a dash of exploration and combat. Play alone or with friends, explore an alien planet, create multi-story factories, and enter conveyor belt heaven!

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

ASKASatisfactory
GamingPickz Score6.9/108.8/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (80%, 12,111)Overwhelmingly Positive (97%, 278,668)
Critic aggregateNo aggregate91/100
Price$24.99$39.99
Install size6 GB20 GB
Steam Deckplayableverified
Released20242024
DeveloperSand Sailor StudioCoffee Stain Studios

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

ASKA vs Satisfactory, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    ASKAAction-adventure action-RPG game
    SatisfactoryOpen-world sandbox game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    ASKAEarly Access, Online Co-Op, Crafting
    SatisfactoryBase-Building, Automation, Open World

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    ASKAScore 6.9 · 80% on Steam
    SatisfactoryScore 8.8 · 97% on Steam · 91 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    ASKA12,111 reviews · 6 GB
    Satisfactory278,668 reviews · 1 add-on · 20 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    ASKA$24.99
    Satisfactory$39.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    ASKAPlayable
    SatisfactoryVerified

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Satisfactory takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

ASKA and Satisfactory on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Satisfactory (GamingPickz Score 8.8)
  • The cheaper right now: ASKA ($24.99)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: Satisfactory (verified)
  • Lighter on storage: ASKA (6 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Satisfactory (278,668 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

Early AccessMultiplayerCraftingCo-opSingleplayerSimulationOpen World Survival CraftBuilding

Where they differ

ASKA is also

Online Co-OpColony SimCharacter CustomizationAction RPGDark FantasyAction-Adventure

Satisfactory is also

AutomationOpen WorldFirst-PersonStrategySci-fiIndie

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, ASKA is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Satisfactory is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

ASKASatisfactory
Minimum GPUNvidia GTX 1650/GTX 1050-ti
Minimum CPUi5-3570 3.4 GHz 4 Core
Minimum RAM8 GB
Install size6 GB20 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: ASKA · Satisfactory.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for ASKA and 9 for Satisfactory. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are ASKA and Satisfactory in scope?

ASKA has drawn 12,111 Steam reviews and installs in 6 GB. Satisfactory has drawn 278,668 Steam reviews, ships 1 add-on and installs in 20 GB.

Is ASKA or Satisfactory better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Satisfactory rates higher (8.8 to 6.9). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, ASKA or Satisfactory?

ASKA is cheaper right now at $24.99, against $39.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each