GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Atlas Reactor vs Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game

Atlas Reactor is a strategy survival game from Trion Worlds (2016) while Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game is a mmorpg RPG game from Lightmare Studios (2014).

Atlas Reactor

2016 · Trion Worlds

7.2GamingPickz Score

Not listed

Steam: Very Positive

Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game

2014 · Lightmare Studios

6.5GamingPickz Score

Free

Steam: Mostly Positive

What each one is

Steam files Atlas Reactor under Strategy and Survival. In contrast, it files Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game under Mmorpg and RPG.

Atlas Reactor

SEASON 6 NOW LIVE! The battle for Atlas continues as a hot (some might even say fiery) new freelancer enters the scene.

Description from its Steam store page

Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game

Outplay your opponent with simultaneous turns and commander-driven deck-building in a fully free-to-play PvP experience. Build your deck from 1000+ cards across 8 unique factions, and face opponents on a truly level playing field. In Infinity Wars, skill is the only factor that determines victory!

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Atlas ReactorInfinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game
GamingPickz Score7.2/106.5/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (84%, 5,291)Mostly Positive (77%, 3,466)
Critic aggregate81/100No aggregate
PriceNot listedFree
Install size5 GB5 GB
Steam DeckUntestedUntested
Released20162014
DeveloperTrion WorldsLightmare Studios

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Atlas Reactor vs Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Atlas ReactorStrategy survival game
    Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card GameMmorpg RPG game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Atlas ReactorFree to Play, Strategy, Turn-Based Tactics
    Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card GameTurn-Based Tactics, PvP, Post-apocalyptic

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Atlas ReactorScore 7.2 · 84% on Steam · 81 critic
    Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card GameScore 6.5 · 77% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Atlas Reactor5,291 reviews · 5 GB
    Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game3,466 reviews · 2 add-ons · 5 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Atlas ReactorNot listed
    Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card GameFree

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

Atlas Reactor takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Atlas Reactor and Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularityAtlas Reactor

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Atlas Reactor (GamingPickz Score 7.2)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

StrategyTurn-Based TacticsTurn-BasedPvPTacticalTurn-Based CombatCompetitiveSci-fi

Where they differ

Atlas Reactor is also

Free to PlayMultiplayerOnline Co-OpMOBAActionCo-op

Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game is also

Post-apocalypticCard BattlerTrading Card GameBoard GameCard GameDragons

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Atlas Reactor is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Atlas Reactor and 0 for Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Atlas Reactor and Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game in scope?

Atlas Reactor has drawn 5,291 Steam reviews and installs in 5 GB. Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game has drawn 3,466 Steam reviews, ships 2 add-ons and installs in 5 GB.

Is Atlas Reactor or Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Atlas Reactor rates higher (7.2 to 6.5). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Atlas Reactor or Infinity Wars: Animated Trading Card Game?

One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each