GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Back 4 Blood vs World War Z

Back 4 Blood is an FPS horror game (2021) while World War Z is an FPS horror game from Saber Interactive Inc (2021).

Back 4 Blood

2021 · Studio not listed

6.4GamingPickz Score

$59.99

Steam: Mixed

World War Z

2021 · Saber Interactive Inc

7.3GamingPickz Score

$14.79

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Back 4 Blood under FPS and Horror. In contrast, it files World War Z under FPS and Horror.

Back 4 Blood

Back 4 Blood is a thrilling cooperative first-person shooter from the creators of the critically acclaimed Left 4 Dead franchise. Experience the intense 4 player co-op narrative campaign, competitive multiplayer as human or Ridden, and frenetic gameplay that keeps you in the action.

Description from its Steam store page

World War Z

World War Z is a heart-pounding coop third-person shooter for up to 4 players featuring massive swarms of hundreds of zombies, focused on fast-paced, gruesomely spectacular action.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Back 4 BloodWorld War Z
GamingPickz Score6.4/107.3/10
Steam ratingMixed (69%, 73,204)Very Positive (82%, 32,551)
Critic aggregate77/100No aggregate
Price$59.99$14.79
Install size40 GB50 GB
Steam Deckplayableunsupported
Released20212021
DeveloperSaber Interactive Inc

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Back 4 Blood vs World War Z, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Back 4 BloodFPS horror game
    World War ZFPS horror game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Back 4 BloodZombies, Online Co-Op, FPS
    World War ZZombies, Online Co-Op, Action

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Back 4 BloodScore 6.4 · 69% on Steam · 77 critic
    World War ZScore 7.3 · 82% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Back 4 Blood73,204 reviews · 4 add-ons · 40 GB
    World War Z32,551 reviews · 22 add-ons · 50 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Back 4 Blood$59.99
    World War Z$14.79

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Back 4 BloodPlayable
    World War ZUnsupported

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

World War Z takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Back 4 Blood and World War Z on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • Multi-platform
  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: World War Z (GamingPickz Score 7.3)
  • The cheaper right now: World War Z ($14.79)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: Back 4 Blood (playable)
  • Lighter on storage: Back 4 Blood (40 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Back 4 Blood (73,204 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

ZombiesOnline Co-OpMultiplayerFPSShooterActionCo-opGore

Where they differ

Back 4 Blood is also

SurvivalBloodAdventurePvPRogue-liteReplay Value

World War Z is also

Third-Person ShooterPost-apocalypticGun CustomizationCharacter CustomizationThird PersonCombat

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Back 4 Blood is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. World War Z is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Back 4 BloodWorld War Z
Minimum GPUNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Minimum CPUIntel Core i5-6600 (3.3 GHz)
Minimum RAM8 GB
Install size40 GB50 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Back 4 Blood · World War Z.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Back 4 Blood and 1 for World War Z. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Close to Back 4 Blood

Common questions

How different are Back 4 Blood and World War Z in scope?

Back 4 Blood has drawn 73,204 Steam reviews, ships 4 add-ons and installs in 40 GB. World War Z has drawn 32,551 Steam reviews, ships 22 add-ons and installs in 50 GB.

Is Back 4 Blood or World War Z better?

By the GamingPickz Score, World War Z rates higher (7.3 to 6.4). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Back 4 Blood or World War Z?

World War Z is cheaper right now at $14.79, against $59.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each