Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition vs Prince of Persia: Warrior Within
Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition is an action-adventure fighting game from Rocksteady Studios (2010) while Prince of Persia: Warrior Within is an action-adventure open-world game (2004).
Quick answer: Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition rates higher, 8.6 to 7.3 on the GamingPickz Score, and Prince of Persia: Warrior Within is the cheaper at $9.99.
What each one is
Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition is filed under Action-Adventure and Fighting. In contrast, Prince of Persia: Warrior Within under Action-Adventure and Open-World.
Experience what it’s like to be Batman and face off against Gotham's greatest villians. Explore every inch of Arkham Asylum and roam freely on the infamous island.
Enter the dark underworld of Prince of Persia Warrior Within, the sword-slashing sequel to the critically acclaimed Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time™. Hunted by Dahaka, an immortal incarnation of Fate seeking divine retribution, the Prince embarks upon a path of both carnage and mystery to defy his preordained death.
Story, characters and reception
No Wikipedia detail on file.
Plot
Seven years after the events of The Sands of Time , following the reversal of his devastating release of the Sands in the palace of Azad, the Prince is hunted by a being called the Dahaka as the Prince was destined to die after releasing the Sands. Seeking advice from a wise man, the Prince learns the Sands were created on a distant island by the Empress of Time. Despite the wise man's warnings about changing fate, the Prince resolves to travel to the… (Wikipedia)
Reception
Reception According to Ubisoft, Prince of Persia: Warrior Within sold 1. 9 million units worldwide in its debut month, 1. 8 Million in the first two weeks. (Wikipedia)
At a glance
| Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition | Prince of Persia: Warrior Within | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 8.6/10 | 7.3/10 |
| Steam rating | Overwhelmingly Positive (96%, 87,230) | Very Positive (83%, 4,127) |
| Critic aggregate | 91/100 | 83/100 |
| Price | $19.99 | $9.99 |
| Install size | — | — |
| Steam Deck | unsupported | playable |
| Released | 2010 | 2004 |
| Developer | Rocksteady Studios | — |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition vs Prince of Persia: Warrior Within, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year EditionAction-adventure fighting gamePrince of Persia: Warrior WithinAction-adventure open-world gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year EditionAction, Stealth, Third PersonPrince of Persia: Warrior WithinAction, Adventure, ParkourThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition ✓Score 8.6 · 96% on Steam · 91 criticPrince of Persia: Warrior WithinScore 7.3 · 83% on Steam · 83 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition87,230 reviewsPrince of Persia: Warrior Within4,127 reviewsReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition$19.99Prince of Persia: Warrior Within ✓$9.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year EditionUnsupportedPrince of Persia: Warrior Within ✓PlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Prince of Persia: Warrior Within takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueBatman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition and Prince of Persia: Warrior Within on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- Mobile
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition (GamingPickz Score 8.6)
- The cheaper right now: Prince of Persia: Warrior Within ($9.99)
- Better on a Steam Deck: Prince of Persia: Warrior Within (playable)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition (87,230 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
ActionThird PersonAdventureSingleplayerOpen WorldAtmosphericStory RichController
Where they differ
StealthSuperheroBeat 'em upDetectiveComic BookAction-Adventure
ParkourGreat SoundtrackPlatformerTime TravelClassicHack and Slash
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Prince of Persia: Warrior Within is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition | Prince of Persia: Warrior Within | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | PCI Express SM3 NVidia 6600/ ATI 1300 | — |
| Minimum CPU | 3Ghz Intel | — |
| Minimum RAM | 1 GB | — |
| Install size | — | — |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition · Prince of Persia: Warrior Within.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition and 0 for Prince of Persia: Warrior Within. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition and Prince of Persia: Warrior Within in scope?
Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition has drawn 87,230 Steam reviews. Prince of Persia: Warrior Within has drawn 4,127 Steam reviews.
Is Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition or Prince of Persia: Warrior Within better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition rates higher (8.6 to 7.3). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition or Prince of Persia: Warrior Within?
Prince of Persia: Warrior Within is cheaper right now at $9.99, against $19.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Should I get Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition or Prince of Persia: Warrior Within?
Batman: Arkham Asylum Game of the Year Edition rates higher, 8.6 to 7.3 on the GamingPickz Score, and Prince of Persia: Warrior Within is the cheaper at $9.99. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.