Beholder 2 vs Five Nights at Freddy's 4
Beholder 2 is a horror simulation game from Alawar Stargaze (Warm Lamp Games) (2018) while Five Nights at Freddy's 4 is a horror simulation game from Scott Cawthon (2015).
What each one is
Steam files Beholder 2 under Horror and Simulation. In contrast, it files Five Nights at Freddy's 4 under Horror and Simulation.
You are an intern at the central ministry of a totalitarian state with your whole career ahead of you. Work your way up the ladder by scheming against employees, spying on your boss, and completing paperwork. Or do you turn against the state and expose corruption. The choice is still yours to make!
In this last chapter of the Five Nights at Freddy's original story, you must once again defend yourself against Freddy Fazbear, Chica, Bonnie, Foxy, and even worse things that lurk in the shadows.
At a glance
| Beholder 2 | Five Nights at Freddy's 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.4/10 | 7.2/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (87%, 8,144) | Very Positive (93%, 16,924) |
| Critic aggregate | 76/100 | 51/100 |
| Price | $17.99 | $7.99 |
| Install size | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Steam Deck | verified | verified |
| Released | 2018 | 2015 |
| Developer | Alawar Stargaze (Warm Lamp Games) | Scott Cawthon |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Beholder 2 vs Five Nights at Freddy's 4, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Beholder 2Horror simulation gameFive Nights at Freddy's 4Horror simulation gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Beholder 2Dystopian , Strategy, Choices MatterFive Nights at Freddy's 4Horror, Survival Horror, First-PersonThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Beholder 2 ✓Score 7.4 · 87% on Steam · 76 criticFive Nights at Freddy's 4Score 7.2 · 93% on Steam · 51 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Beholder 28,144 reviews · 4 GBFive Nights at Freddy's 416,924 reviews · 1 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Beholder 2$17.99Five Nights at Freddy's 4 ✓$7.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Beholder 2VerifiedFive Nights at Freddy's 4VerifiedValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueBeholder 2 and Five Nights at Freddy's 4 on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- Mobile
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Beholder 2 (GamingPickz Score 7.4)
- The cheaper right now: Five Nights at Freddy's 4 ($7.99)
- Lighter on storage: Five Nights at Freddy's 4 (1 GB)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: Five Nights at Freddy's 4 (16,924 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
StrategySimulationStory RichSingleplayerAtmosphericDarkPoint & ClickIndie
Where they differ
Dystopian Choices MatterPolitical SimPoliticalMultiple EndingsPolitics
HorrorSurvival HorrorFirst-PersonRobotsDifficultSurvival
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Beholder 2 is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Five Nights at Freddy's 4 is demanding, for players who want a challenge.
System requirements, side by side
| Beholder 2 | Five Nights at Freddy's 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | NVIDIA GT 630 / 650m | — |
| Minimum CPU | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4 GHz, AMD FX 8120 @ 3.1 GHz | 2 GHz Intel Pentium 4 |
| Minimum RAM | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Install size | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Beholder 2 · Five Nights at Freddy's 4.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Beholder 2 and 0 for Five Nights at Freddy's 4. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Beholder 2 and Five Nights at Freddy's 4 in scope?
Beholder 2 has drawn 8,144 Steam reviews and installs in 4 GB. Five Nights at Freddy's 4 has drawn 16,924 Steam reviews and installs in 1 GB.
Is Beholder 2 or Five Nights at Freddy's 4 better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Beholder 2 rates higher (7.4 to 7.2). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Beholder 2 or Five Nights at Freddy's 4?
Five Nights at Freddy's 4 is cheaper right now at $7.99, against $17.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.