Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 vs World of Tanks
Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 is an FPS strategy game from Gearbox Software (2005) while World of Tanks is a simulation mmorpg game from Wargaming (2010).
Quick answer: World of Tanks rates higher, 7.5 to 7.4 on the GamingPickz Score, and World of Tanks is the cheaper at Free.
What each one is
Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 is filed under FPS and Strategy. In contrast, World of Tanks under Simulation and Mmorpg.
Based on a true story. Set during the famous airdrop before the invasion at Normandy, where Sgt. Matt Baker and his squad of 101st Airborne Paratroopers were scattered over the French countryside.
World of Tanks is a tactical action game with very different gameplay depending on the vehicle type and role. Aside from regular PvP, there are competitive and clan-based modes, special PvE and PvPvE events, and much more. Whether you play to dominate or just enjoy the ride, you'll fit right in.
Story, characters and reception
Plot
On June 6, 1944, Sergeant Matt Baker participates in the initial jump off , taking place hours before the Normandy landings . When their plane is hit by anti-aircraft fire, killing Private David Muzza, Baker is thrown from the plane and separated from his squad. After landing, Baker eventually manages to regroup with Staff Sergeant "Mac" Hassey, radioman Private First Class Kevin Leggett and Lieutenant Colonel Cole . (Wikipedia)
Reception
Reception Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 received "generally favorable" reviews, according to review aggregator platform Metacritic . Philip Morton of Thunderbolt gave the game a perfect 10/10 rating and called it as "exactly what the genre needed". He praised the gameplay that he described as "honed to near-perfection". (Wikipedia)
Reception
Critical response Reception World of Tanks (and the iOS version of World of Tanks Blitz ) received "generally favorable reviews" on all platforms according to the review aggregation website Metacritic . GameZone gave the PC version a score of eight out of ten and stated, "For a free-to-play game, World of Tanks is insanely detailed and has combat that takes a while to get used to. The more you learn about the game and the more you play, the better you'll… (Wikipedia)
At a glance
| Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 | World of Tanks | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.4/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (88%, 2,173) | Very Positive (80%, 100,753) |
| Critic aggregate | 87/100 | 80/100 |
| Price | $9.99 | Free |
| Install size | — | 120 GB |
| Steam Deck | unsupported | playable |
| Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Developer | Gearbox Software | Wargaming |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 vs World of Tanks, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30FPS strategy gameWorld of TanksSimulation mmorpg gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30FPS, Action, World War IIWorld of TanksTanks, Free to Play, ActionThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30Score 7.4 · 88% on Steam · 87 criticWorld of Tanks ✓Score 7.5 · 80% on Steam · 80 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 302,173 reviewsWorld of Tanks100,753 reviews · 32 add-ons · 120 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30$9.99World of Tanks ✓FreeRead live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30UnsupportedWorld of Tanks ✓PlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
World of Tanks takes 3 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueBrothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 and World of Tanks on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- Mobile
- Multi-platform
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The cheaper right now: World of Tanks (Free)
- Better on a Steam Deck: World of Tanks (playable)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: World of Tanks (100,753 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
ActionWorld War IIShooterWarTacticalMilitaryMultiplayerHistorical
Where they differ
FPSFirst-PersonSingleplayerStrategyStory RichClassic
TanksFree to PlayPvPVehicular CombatTeam-BasedMassively Multiplayer
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. World of Tanks is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 | World of Tanks | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | — | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 / AMD Radeon R9 270 |
| Minimum CPU | — | Intel Core i5-3330 / AMD FX-6300 |
| Minimum RAM | — | 8 GB |
| Install size | — | 120 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 · World of Tanks.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 and 5 for World of Tanks. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 and World of Tanks in scope?
Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 has drawn 2,173 Steam reviews. World of Tanks has drawn 100,753 Steam reviews, ships 32 add-ons and installs in 120 GB.
Is Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 or World of Tanks better?
By the GamingPickz Score, World of Tanks rates higher (7.5 to 7.4). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 or World of Tanks?
World of Tanks is cheaper right now at Free, against $9.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Should I get Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 or World of Tanks?
World of Tanks rates higher, 7.5 to 7.4 on the GamingPickz Score, and World of Tanks is the cheaper at Free. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.