Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition vs Wolfenstein: The Old Blood
Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition is an FPS game from People Can Fly (2017) while Wolfenstein: The Old Blood is an FPS horror game from MachineGames (2015).
What each one is
Steam files Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition under FPS. In contrast, it files Wolfenstein: The Old Blood under FPS and Horror.
Step into the boots of Grayson Hunt after a crash landing on an old resort planet forces him to make a hard choice: survival or revenge. Execute masterful kills with Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition’s unique combat system that rewards you for performing the most creative and deadly kills imaginable.
Wolfenstein®: The Old Blood™ is a standalone prequel to the critically acclaimed first-person action-adventure shooter, Wolfenstein®: The New Order. This adventure spans eight chapters and features the hallmarks of MachineGames – thrilling action, immersive story, and intense FPS combat.
At a glance
| Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition | Wolfenstein: The Old Blood | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.5/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (89%, 9,652) | Very Positive (90%, 23,595) |
| Critic aggregate | 76/100 | 76/100 |
| Price | $39.99 | $19.99 |
| Install size | 15 GB | 38 GB |
| Steam Deck | playable | verified |
| Released | 2017 | 2015 |
| Developer | People Can Fly | MachineGames |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition vs Wolfenstein: The Old Blood, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Bulletstorm: Full Clip EditionFPS gameWolfenstein: The Old BloodFPS horror gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Bulletstorm: Full Clip EditionAction, Gore, FPSWolfenstein: The Old BloodFPS, Action, World War IIThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Bulletstorm: Full Clip EditionScore 7.5 · 89% on Steam · 76 criticWolfenstein: The Old Blood ✓Score 7.7 · 90% on Steam · 76 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition9,652 reviews · 15 GBWolfenstein: The Old Blood23,595 reviews · 38 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition$39.99Wolfenstein: The Old Blood ✓$19.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Bulletstorm: Full Clip EditionPlayableWolfenstein: The Old Blood ✓VerifiedValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Wolfenstein: The Old Blood takes 3 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueBulletstorm: Full Clip Edition and Wolfenstein: The Old Blood on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Wolfenstein: The Old Blood (GamingPickz Score 7.7)
- The cheaper right now: Wolfenstein: The Old Blood ($19.99)
- Better on a Steam Deck: Wolfenstein: The Old Blood (verified)
- Lighter on storage: Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition (15 GB)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: Wolfenstein: The Old Blood (23,595 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
ActionGoreFPSAdventureFirst-PersonShooterSingleplayerSci-fi
Where they differ
ViolentComedyCo-opDark HumorGreat SoundtrackSexual Content
World War IIAlternate HistoryStealthZombiesWarHorror
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Wolfenstein: The Old Blood is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition | Wolfenstein: The Old Blood | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | Radeon HD 6850 | — |
| Minimum CPU | AMD A8-3850 | — |
| Minimum RAM | 6 GB | — |
| Install size | 15 GB | 38 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition · Wolfenstein: The Old Blood.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 5 accessibility features for Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition and 4 for Wolfenstein: The Old Blood. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition and Wolfenstein: The Old Blood in scope?
Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition has drawn 9,652 Steam reviews and installs in 15 GB. Wolfenstein: The Old Blood has drawn 23,595 Steam reviews and installs in 38 GB.
Is Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition or Wolfenstein: The Old Blood better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Wolfenstein: The Old Blood rates higher (7.7 to 7.5). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition or Wolfenstein: The Old Blood?
Wolfenstein: The Old Blood is cheaper right now at $19.99, against $39.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.