Call of Duty: Warzone vs Call of Duty: World at War
Call of Duty: Warzone is an FPS game from Treyarch (2020) while Call of Duty: World at War is an FPS horror game from Treyarch (2008).
Quick answer: Call of Duty: World at War has the higher Metacritic, 83 to 80.
Call of Duty: Warzone
What each one is
Call of Duty: Warzone is filed under FPS. In contrast, Call of Duty: World at War under FPS and Horror.
Call of Duty: Warzone was a free-to-play battle royale first-person shooter game developed by Raven Software and Infinity Ward and published by Activision as part of the Call of Duty video game series. It was released on March 10, 2020, for PlayStation 4, Windows, and Xbox One as part of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (2019) and was subsequently connected to Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War (2020) and Call of Duty: Vanguard (2021), but did not require purchase of any of the aforementioned titles. Warzone allowed online multiplayer combat among 150 players and featured both cross-platform play and cross-platform progression between the three aforementioned titles.
Call of Duty is back, redefining war like you've never experienced before. Building on the Call of Duty 4®: Modern Warfare engine, Call of Duty: World at War immerses players into the most gritty and chaotic WWII combat ever experienced.
Story, characters and reception
Plot
Warzone 's story is intertwined with the seasonal narratives of Modern Warfare , Black Ops Cold War and Vanguard . Verdansk is used as a common setting across various multiplayer maps in Modern Warfare , while Rebirth Island is inspired by locations and stories in previous Black Ops games. Caldera and Fortune's Keep complement Vanguard 's seasonal story. (Wikipedia)
Reception
Reception Call of Duty: Warzone received "generally favorable" reviews from critics across all platforms, according to review aggregator Metacritic . OpenCritic determined that 78% of critics recommended the game. GameSpot gave the game a 7/10 rating, summarizing with: " Warzone is a great sophomore attempt at a battle royale from Call of Duty , which finally manages to carve out its own identity with interesting spins on the existing formula. (Wikipedia)
Plot
American campaign In August 1942, captured U. S. Marine Private C. (Wikipedia)
Reception
Reception Critical response Call of Duty: World at War received "generally favorable" reviews, according to review aggregator website Metacritic . Describing the game as a whole, GameSpot stated that by returning to the World War II setting, " World at War achieves greatness but falls short of excellence. " IGN concluded that World at War was a "solid, confident shooter with plenty to offer the casual and hardcore alike. (Wikipedia)
At a glance
| Call of Duty: Warzone | Call of Duty: World at War | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | — | 8.1/10 |
| Steam rating | — | Very Positive (92%, 53,215) |
| Critic aggregate | 80/100 | 83/100 |
| Price | Unknown | $19.99 |
| Install size | — | — |
| Steam Deck | Untested | unsupported |
| Released | 2020 | 2008 |
| Developer | Treyarch | Treyarch |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Call of Duty: Warzone vs Call of Duty: World at War, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Call of Duty: WarzoneFPS gameCall of Duty: World at WarFPS horror gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Call of Duty: WarzoneNo descriptive tagsCall of Duty: World at WarZombies, World War II, FPSThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Call of Duty: WarzoneMetacritic 80Call of Duty: World at War ✓Metacritic 83Metacritic's critic aggregate, from the game's Wikipedia reception where it was never on Steam.
Content and scale
Call of Duty: Warzone—Call of Duty: World at War53,215 reviewsReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Call of Duty: WarzoneUnknownCall of Duty: World at War$19.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
Call of Duty: World at War takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The better reviewed of the two: Call of Duty: World at War (Metacritic 83)
Where they differ
ZombiesWorld War IIFPSMultiplayerActionShooter
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Call of Duty: Warzone is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Call of Duty: World at War is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Call of Duty: Warzone | Call of Duty: World at War | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | — | — |
| Minimum CPU | — | Pentium 4 @ 3 GHz/AMD 64 3200+ |
| Minimum RAM | — | 0.5 GB |
| Install size | — | — |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Call of Duty: Warzone · Call of Duty: World at War.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Call of Duty: Warzone and 0 for Call of Duty: World at War. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Call of Duty: Warzone and Call of Duty: World at War in scope?
Call of Duty: Warzone lists little scope data. Call of Duty: World at War has drawn 53,215 Steam reviews.
Is Call of Duty: Warzone or Call of Duty: World at War better?
Neither carries enough reviews for us to score it reliably, so we do not call a winner. The table above shows what each does have.
Which is cheaper, Call of Duty: Warzone or Call of Duty: World at War?
One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.
Should I get Call of Duty: Warzone or Call of Duty: World at War?
Call of Duty: World at War has the higher Metacritic, 83 to 80. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
All comparisonsHow we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.