Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront vs World of Tanks
Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront is a simulation strategy game from Barbedwire Studios (2021) while World of Tanks is a simulation mmorpg game from Wargaming (2010).
Quick answer: Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront and World of Tanks are too close, or too thinly reviewed, to separate on the numbers; the table below shows what each holds.
What each one is
Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront is filed under Simulation and Strategy. In contrast, World of Tanks under Simulation and Mmorpg.
Call to Arms - Gates of Hell is a realistic RTS/ RTT game that offers endless replay value. Command all types of troops in historical singleplayer, dynamic campaign, PvP and PvE battles. Are you ready for some serious immersion in World War 2?
World of Tanks is a tactical action game with very different gameplay depending on the vehicle type and role. Aside from regular PvP, there are competitive and clan-based modes, special PvE and PvPvE events, and much more. Whether you play to dominate or just enjoy the ride, you'll fit right in.
Story, characters and reception
No Wikipedia detail on file.
Reception
Critical response Reception World of Tanks (and the iOS version of World of Tanks Blitz ) received "generally favorable reviews" on all platforms according to the review aggregation website Metacritic . GameZone gave the PC version a score of eight out of ten and stated, "For a free-to-play game, World of Tanks is insanely detailed and has combat that takes a while to get used to. The more you learn about the game and the more you play, the better you'll… (Wikipedia)
At a glance
| Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront | World of Tanks | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (85%, 33,894) | Very Positive (80%, 100,753) |
| Critic aggregate | No aggregate | 80/100 |
| Price | $34.99 | Free |
| Install size | 80 GB | 120 GB |
| Steam Deck | unsupported | playable |
| Released | 2021 | 2010 |
| Developer | Barbedwire Studios | Wargaming |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront vs World of Tanks, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: OstfrontSimulation strategy gameWorld of TanksSimulation mmorpg gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: OstfrontWorld War II, Historical, Real Time TacticsWorld of TanksTanks, Free to Play, ActionThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: OstfrontScore 7.5 · 85% on SteamWorld of TanksScore 7.5 · 80% on Steam · 80 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront33,894 reviews · 7 add-ons · 80 GBWorld of Tanks100,753 reviews · 32 add-ons · 120 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront$34.99World of Tanks ✓FreeRead live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: OstfrontUnsupportedWorld of Tanks ✓PlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
World of Tanks takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueCall to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront and World of Tanks on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- Mobile
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The cheaper right now: World of Tanks (Free)
- Better on a Steam Deck: World of Tanks (playable)
- Lighter on storage: Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront (80 GB)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: World of Tanks (100,753 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
World War IIHistoricalThird PersonWarRealisticPvEMultiplayerMilitary
Where they differ
Real Time TacticsStrategyRTSSingleplayerModdableInventory Management
TanksFree to PlayActionVehicular CombatTeam-BasedTactical
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. World of Tanks is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront | World of Tanks | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | GTX 1070 / RX 5600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 / AMD Radeon R9 270 |
| Minimum CPU | — | Intel Core i5-3330 / AMD FX-6300 |
| Minimum RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Install size | 80 GB | 120 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront · World of Tanks.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 7 accessibility features for Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront and 5 for World of Tanks. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront and World of Tanks in scope?
Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront has drawn 33,894 Steam reviews, ships 7 add-ons and installs in 80 GB. World of Tanks has drawn 100,753 Steam reviews, ships 32 add-ons and installs in 120 GB.
Is Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront or World of Tanks better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront rates higher (7.5 to 7.5). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront or World of Tanks?
World of Tanks is cheaper right now at Free, against $34.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Should I get Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront or World of Tanks?
Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront and World of Tanks are too close, or too thinly reviewed, to separate on the numbers; the table below shows what each holds. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.