GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Chivalry: Medieval Warfare vs Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm

Chivalry: Medieval Warfare is an FPS simulation game from Torn Banner Studios (2012) while Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm is an FPS mmorpg game from Tripwire Interactive (2011).

Quick answer: Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm rates higher, 7.9 to 7.6 on the GamingPickz Score, and Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm is the cheaper at $19.99.

Chivalry: Medieval Warfare

2012 · Torn Banner Studios

7.6GamingPickz Score

$24.99

Steam: Very Positive

Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm

2011 · Tripwire Interactive

7.9GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Chivalry: Medieval Warfare is filed under FPS and Simulation. In contrast, Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm under FPS and Mmorpg.

Chivalry: Medieval Warfare

Besiege castles and raid villages in Chivalry: Medieval Warfare, a fast-paced medieval first person slasher with a focus on multiplayer battles

Description from its Steam store page

Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm

Contains full Rising Storm content as well!

Description from its Steam store page

Story, characters and reception

Chivalry: Medieval Warfare
Reception

Critical reception Reception The game received generally favorable reviews with a Metacritic score of 79/100 based on 24 different critics. IGN gave it a 7. 9/10, praising its medieval style ultra-violent multiplayer gameplay, but also mentioned that the game had a limited number of classes. (Wikipedia)

Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm

No Wikipedia detail on file.

At a glance

Chivalry: Medieval WarfareRed Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm
GamingPickz Score7.6/107.9/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (83%, 65,058)Very Positive (93%, 38,119)
Critic aggregate79/10076/100
Price$24.99$19.99
Install size
Steam Deckunsupportedplayable
Released20122011
DeveloperTorn Banner StudiosTripwire Interactive

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Chivalry: Medieval Warfare vs Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Chivalry: Medieval WarfareFPS simulation game
    Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising StormFPS mmorpg game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Chivalry: Medieval WarfareMedieval, Action, Gore
    Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising StormWorld War II, Realistic, FPS

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Chivalry: Medieval WarfareScore 7.6 · 83% on Steam · 79 critic
    Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising StormScore 7.9 · 93% on Steam · 76 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Chivalry: Medieval Warfare65,058 reviews · 2 add-ons
    Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm38,119 reviews

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Chivalry: Medieval Warfare$24.99
    Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm$19.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Chivalry: Medieval WarfareUnsupported
    Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising StormPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm takes 3 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Chivalry: Medieval Warfare and Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm (GamingPickz Score 7.9)
  • The cheaper right now: Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm ($19.99)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm (playable)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

MultiplayerActionGoreFirst-PersonTeam-BasedHistoricalFPSAtmospheric

Where they differ

Chivalry: Medieval Warfare is also

MedievalSwordplayViolentPvPIndieThird Person

Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm is also

World War IIRealisticWargameWarImmersive SimTactical

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Chivalry: Medieval Warfare is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Chivalry: Medieval WarfareRed Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm
Minimum GPU256 MB SM 3.0 DX9 Compliant NVIDIA® GeForce 7800 GTX
Minimum CPUDual Core 2.3 GHz
Minimum RAM2 GB
Install size

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Chivalry: Medieval Warfare · Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Chivalry: Medieval Warfare and 0 for Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Close to Chivalry: Medieval Warfare
Close to Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm

Common questions

How different are Chivalry: Medieval Warfare and Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm in scope?

Chivalry: Medieval Warfare has drawn 65,058 Steam reviews and ships 2 add-ons. Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm has drawn 38,119 Steam reviews.

Is Chivalry: Medieval Warfare or Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm rates higher (7.9 to 7.6). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Chivalry: Medieval Warfare or Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm?

Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm is cheaper right now at $19.99, against $24.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Should I get Chivalry: Medieval Warfare or Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm?

Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm rates higher, 7.9 to 7.6 on the GamingPickz Score, and Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad with Rising Storm is the cheaper at $19.99. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each