Chivalry: Medieval Warfare vs World of Tanks
Chivalry: Medieval Warfare is an FPS simulation game from Torn Banner Studios (2012) while World of Tanks is a simulation mmorpg game from Wargaming (2010).
Quick answer: Chivalry: Medieval Warfare rates higher, 7.6 to 7.5 on the GamingPickz Score, and World of Tanks is the cheaper at Free.
What each one is
Chivalry: Medieval Warfare is filed under FPS and Simulation. In contrast, World of Tanks under Simulation and Mmorpg.
Besiege castles and raid villages in Chivalry: Medieval Warfare, a fast-paced medieval first person slasher with a focus on multiplayer battles
World of Tanks is a tactical action game with very different gameplay depending on the vehicle type and role. Aside from regular PvP, there are competitive and clan-based modes, special PvE and PvPvE events, and much more. Whether you play to dominate or just enjoy the ride, you'll fit right in.
Story, characters and reception
Reception
Critical reception Reception The game received generally favorable reviews with a Metacritic score of 79/100 based on 24 different critics. IGN gave it a 7. 9/10, praising its medieval style ultra-violent multiplayer gameplay, but also mentioned that the game had a limited number of classes. (Wikipedia)
Reception
Critical response Reception World of Tanks (and the iOS version of World of Tanks Blitz ) received "generally favorable reviews" on all platforms according to the review aggregation website Metacritic . GameZone gave the PC version a score of eight out of ten and stated, "For a free-to-play game, World of Tanks is insanely detailed and has combat that takes a while to get used to. The more you learn about the game and the more you play, the better you'll… (Wikipedia)
At a glance
| Chivalry: Medieval Warfare | World of Tanks | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.6/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (83%, 65,058) | Very Positive (80%, 100,753) |
| Critic aggregate | 79/100 | 80/100 |
| Price | $24.99 | Free |
| Install size | — | 120 GB |
| Steam Deck | unsupported | playable |
| Released | 2012 | 2010 |
| Developer | Torn Banner Studios | Wargaming |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Chivalry: Medieval Warfare vs World of Tanks, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Chivalry: Medieval WarfareFPS simulation gameWorld of TanksSimulation mmorpg gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Chivalry: Medieval WarfareMedieval, Action, GoreWorld of TanksTanks, Free to Play, ActionThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Chivalry: Medieval Warfare ✓Score 7.6 · 83% on Steam · 79 criticWorld of TanksScore 7.5 · 80% on Steam · 80 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Chivalry: Medieval Warfare65,058 reviews · 2 add-onsWorld of Tanks100,753 reviews · 32 add-ons · 120 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Chivalry: Medieval Warfare$24.99World of Tanks ✓FreeRead live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Chivalry: Medieval WarfareUnsupportedWorld of Tanks ✓PlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
World of Tanks takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueChivalry: Medieval Warfare and World of Tanks on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- Mobile
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The cheaper right now: World of Tanks (Free)
- Better on a Steam Deck: World of Tanks (playable)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
MultiplayerActionPvPThird PersonTeam-BasedCo-opHistoricalSimulation
Where they differ
MedievalGoreFirst-PersonSwordplayViolentIndie
TanksFree to PlayMilitaryVehicular CombatTacticalMassively Multiplayer
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Chivalry: Medieval Warfare is demanding, for players who want a challenge. World of Tanks is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Chivalry: Medieval Warfare | World of Tanks | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | — | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 / AMD Radeon R9 270 |
| Minimum CPU | — | Intel Core i5-3330 / AMD FX-6300 |
| Minimum RAM | — | 8 GB |
| Install size | — | 120 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Chivalry: Medieval Warfare · World of Tanks.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Chivalry: Medieval Warfare and 5 for World of Tanks. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Chivalry: Medieval Warfare and World of Tanks in scope?
Chivalry: Medieval Warfare has drawn 65,058 Steam reviews and ships 2 add-ons. World of Tanks has drawn 100,753 Steam reviews, ships 32 add-ons and installs in 120 GB.
Is Chivalry: Medieval Warfare or World of Tanks better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Chivalry: Medieval Warfare rates higher (7.6 to 7.5). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Chivalry: Medieval Warfare or World of Tanks?
World of Tanks is cheaper right now at Free, against $24.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Should I get Chivalry: Medieval Warfare or World of Tanks?
Chivalry: Medieval Warfare rates higher, 7.6 to 7.5 on the GamingPickz Score, and World of Tanks is the cheaper at Free. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.