Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars vs Supreme Commander
Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars is a strategy game from Danger Close Games (2007) while Supreme Commander is a strategy game from Gas Powered Games (2011).
What each one is
Steam files Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars under Strategy. In contrast, it files Supreme Commander under Strategy.
The year is 2047. A massive nuclear fireball explodes high in the night sky, marking the dramatic beginning of the Third Tiberium War and the long-awaited return of the most groundbreaking Real-Time Strategy franchise of all time
For a thousand years, three opposing forces have waged war for what they believe is true. There can be no room for compromise: their way is the only way. Dubbed The Infinite War, this devastating conflict has taken its toll on a once-peaceful galaxy and has only served to deepen the hatred between the factions.
At a glance
| Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars | Supreme Commander | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.7/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (90%, 9,333) | Very Positive (89%, 3,150) |
| Critic aggregate | 85/100 | 86/100 |
| Price | Not listed | $12.99 |
| Install size | — | — |
| Steam Deck | playable | unsupported |
| Released | 2007 | 2011 |
| Developer | Danger Close Games | Gas Powered Games |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars vs Supreme Commander, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium WarsStrategy gameSupreme CommanderStrategy gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium WarsFamily Friendly, Level Editor, StrategySupreme CommanderStrategy, RTS, Sci-fiThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars ✓Score 7.7 · 90% on Steam · 85 criticSupreme CommanderScore 7.5 · 89% on Steam · 86 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars9,333 reviewsSupreme Commander3,150 reviewsReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium WarsNot listedSupreme Commander$12.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars ✓PlayableSupreme CommanderUnsupportedValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueCommand & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars and Supreme Commander on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars (GamingPickz Score 7.7)
- Better on a Steam Deck: Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars (playable)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars (9,333 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
StrategyRTSActionMultiplayerSingleplayerBase-BuildingSci-fiWar
Where they differ
Family FriendlyLevel EditorAction RTSCity BuilderFMVAtmospheric
Real-TimeCo-opReal-Time with PauseRobotsSpace
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars is family-friendly and approachable. Supreme Commander is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars | Supreme Commander | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | ATI Radeon 8500 | — |
| Minimum CPU | 2GHz AMD Athlon™ processor | — |
| Minimum RAM | 0.5 GB | — |
| Install size | — | — |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars · Supreme Commander.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars and 0 for Supreme Commander. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars and Supreme Commander in scope?
Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars has drawn 9,333 Steam reviews. Supreme Commander has drawn 3,150 Steam reviews.
Is Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars or Supreme Commander better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars rates higher (7.7 to 7.5). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars or Supreme Commander?
One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.