Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts vs Men of War: Assault Squad
Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts is an action-adventure simulation game from Relic Entertainment (2007) while Men of War: Assault Squad is a sandbox simulation game from Digitalmindsoft (2011).
What each one is
Steam files Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts under Action-Adventure and Simulation. In contrast, it files Men of War: Assault Squad under Sandbox and Simulation.
The next chapter in the #1 rated RTS franchise thrusts players into a hellish war torn landscape to command two battle-hardened armies in relentless campaigns for honor and country. Players lead the tenacious British 2nd Army during the heroic World War II liberation of Caen, France, and command the German Panzer Elite as they struggle...
Men of War: Assault Squad delivers a deeply tactical WWII experience, blending large-scale strategy with intense, hands-on combat. Fight across multiple fronts – from European countryside to Pacific jungles and command every unit and every bullet on the battlefield.
At a glance
| Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts | Men of War: Assault Squad | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.4/10 | 7.3/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (92%, 1,205) | Very Positive (87%, 5,176) |
| Critic aggregate | 87/100 | 77/100 |
| Price | $19.99 | $9.99 |
| Install size | — | — |
| Steam Deck | unsupported | playable |
| Released | 2007 | 2011 |
| Developer | Relic Entertainment | Digitalmindsoft |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts vs Men of War: Assault Squad, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Company of Heroes: Opposing FrontsAction-adventure simulation gameMen of War: Assault SquadSandbox simulation gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Company of Heroes: Opposing FrontsStrategy, RTS, World War IIMen of War: Assault SquadStrategy, World War II, WarThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts ✓Score 7.4 · 92% on Steam · 87 criticMen of War: Assault SquadScore 7.3 · 87% on Steam · 77 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts1,205 reviewsMen of War: Assault Squad5,176 reviews · 5 add-onsReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts$19.99Men of War: Assault Squad ✓$9.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Company of Heroes: Opposing FrontsUnsupportedMen of War: Assault Squad ✓PlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Men of War: Assault Squad takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueCompany of Heroes: Opposing Fronts and Men of War: Assault Squad on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts (GamingPickz Score 7.4)
- The cheaper right now: Men of War: Assault Squad ($9.99)
- Better on a Steam Deck: Men of War: Assault Squad (playable)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: Men of War: Assault Squad (5,176 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
StrategyRTSWorld War IIActionSingleplayerMultiplayerMilitaryTactical
Where they differ
Base-BuildingOnline Co-Op
RealisticModdableDestructionLevel EditorEpicSandbox
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Men of War: Assault Squad is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts | Men of War: Assault Squad | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | DirectX 9.0c compatible 64MB video card with Pixel Shader 1.1 support | — |
| Minimum CPU | 2.0Ghz Intel Pentium IV | — |
| Minimum RAM | 0.5 GB | — |
| Install size | — | — |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts · Men of War: Assault Squad.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts and 0 for Men of War: Assault Squad. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts and Men of War: Assault Squad in scope?
Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts has drawn 1,205 Steam reviews. Men of War: Assault Squad has drawn 5,176 Steam reviews and ships 5 add-ons.
Is Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts or Men of War: Assault Squad better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts rates higher (7.4 to 7.3). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts or Men of War: Assault Squad?
Men of War: Assault Squad is cheaper right now at $9.99, against $19.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.