GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Content Warning vs Inside the Backrooms

Content Warning is an action-adventure horror game from Zorro (2024) while Inside the Backrooms is an FPS horror game from MrFatcat (2022).

Content Warning

2024 · Zorro

8.4GamingPickz Score

$4.95

Steam: Very Positive

Inside the Backrooms

2022 · MrFatcat

7.2GamingPickz Score

$6.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Content Warning under Action-Adventure and Horror. In contrast, it files Inside the Backrooms under FPS and Horror.

Content Warning

Film your friends doing scary things to become SpöökTube famous! (strongly advised to not go alone)

Description from its Steam store page

Inside the Backrooms

Inside the Backrooms is a horror multiplayer game mixed with different mechanics that will make you spend an intense night with friends. Explore, think, interact, but be careful, it is rumored that there are several entities wishing to find you...

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Content WarningInside the Backrooms
GamingPickz Score8.4/107.2/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (94%, 162,949)Very Positive (80%, 46,767)
Critic aggregateNo aggregateNo aggregate
Price$4.95$6.99
Install size4 GB20 GB
Steam Deckverifiedplayable
Released20242022
DeveloperZorroMrFatcat

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Content Warning vs Inside the Backrooms, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Content WarningAction-adventure horror game
    Inside the BackroomsFPS horror game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Content WarningOnline Co-Op, Horror, Funny
    Inside the BackroomsHorror, Survival Horror, Puzzle

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Content WarningScore 8.4 · 94% on Steam
    Inside the BackroomsScore 7.2 · 80% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Content Warning162,949 reviews · 4 GB
    Inside the Backrooms46,767 reviews · 20 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Content Warning$4.95
    Inside the Backrooms$6.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Content WarningVerified
    Inside the BackroomsPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Content Warning takes 3 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Content Warning and Inside the Backrooms on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Content Warning (GamingPickz Score 8.4)
  • The cheaper right now: Content Warning ($4.95)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: Content Warning (verified)
  • Lighter on storage: Content Warning (4 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Content Warning (162,949 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

Online Co-OpHorrorMultiplayerFirst-PersonCo-opPsychological HorrorSurvival HorrorExploration

Where they differ

Content Warning is also

FunnyDungeon CrawlerSupernaturalTime ManagementAction-AdventureInvestigation

Inside the Backrooms is also

PuzzleFPSDarkVRStory RichPvE

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Content Warning is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Inside the Backrooms is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Content WarningInside the Backrooms
Minimum GPUNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 tiNvidia GeForce GTX 760
Minimum CPUIntel Core i5 @ 2.5 GHzIntel Core i5-2300 2.8 GHz / AMD FX-6300, 3.5 GHz
Minimum RAM8 GB8 GB
Install size4 GB20 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Content Warning · Inside the Backrooms.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Content Warning and 0 for Inside the Backrooms. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Content Warning and Inside the Backrooms in scope?

Content Warning has drawn 162,949 Steam reviews and installs in 4 GB. Inside the Backrooms has drawn 46,767 Steam reviews and installs in 20 GB.

Is Content Warning or Inside the Backrooms better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Content Warning rates higher (8.4 to 7.2). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Content Warning or Inside the Backrooms?

Content Warning is cheaper right now at $4.95, against $6.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each