GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive vs Day of Defeat: Source

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is an FPS strategy game from Valve (2012) while Day of Defeat: Source is an FPS simulation game from Valve (2010).

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012 · Valve

8.4GamingPickz Score

Free

Steam: Very Positive

Day of Defeat: Source

2010 · Valve

7.9GamingPickz Score

$9.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Counter-Strike: Global Offensive under FPS and Strategy. In contrast, it files Day of Defeat: Source under FPS and Simulation.

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

For over two decades, Counter-Strike has offered an elite competitive experience, one shaped by millions of players from across the globe. And now the next chapter in the CS story is about to begin. This is Counter-Strike 2.

Description from its Steam store page

Day of Defeat: Source

Valve's WWII Multiplayer Classic - Now available for Mac.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Counter-Strike: Global OffensiveDay of Defeat: Source
GamingPickz Score8.4/107.9/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (86%, 9,826,211)Very Positive (92%, 23,601)
Critic aggregateNo aggregate80/100
PriceFree$9.99
Install size85 GB
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20122010
DeveloperValveValve

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive vs Day of Defeat: Source, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Counter-Strike: Global OffensiveFPS strategy game
    Day of Defeat: SourceFPS simulation game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Counter-Strike: Global OffensiveFPS, Shooter, Competitive
    Day of Defeat: SourceFPS, World War II, Action

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Counter-Strike: Global OffensiveScore 8.4 · 86% on Steam
    Day of Defeat: SourceScore 7.9 · 92% on Steam · 80 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Counter-Strike: Global Offensive9,826,211 reviews · 1 add-on · 85 GB
    Day of Defeat: Source23,601 reviews

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Counter-Strike: Global OffensiveFree
    Day of Defeat: Source$9.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Counter-Strike: Global OffensivePlayable
    Day of Defeat: SourcePlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive and Day of Defeat: Source on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (GamingPickz Score 8.4)
  • The cheaper right now: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (Free)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (9,826,211 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

FPSShooterMultiplayerActionTeam-BasedTacticalFirst-PersonOnline Co-Op

Where they differ

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is also

Competitivee-sportsPvPCo-opDifficultTrading

Day of Defeat: Source is also

World War IIHistoricalClass-BasedClassicGoreMassively Multiplayer

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Day of Defeat: Source is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Counter-Strike: Global OffensiveDay of Defeat: Source
Minimum GPUVideo card must be 1 GB
Minimum CPU4 hardware CPU threads - Intel® Core™ i5 750
Minimum RAM8 GB
Install size85 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive · Day of Defeat: Source.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 6 accessibility features for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive and 6 for Day of Defeat: Source. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Counter-Strike: Global Offensive and Day of Defeat: Source in scope?

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive has drawn 9,826,211 Steam reviews, ships 1 add-on and installs in 85 GB. Day of Defeat: Source has drawn 23,601 Steam reviews.

Is Counter-Strike: Global Offensive or Day of Defeat: Source better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive rates higher (8.4 to 7.9). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive or Day of Defeat: Source?

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is cheaper right now at Free, against $9.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each