GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Creative Destruction vs Z1 Battle Royale

Creative Destruction is an FPS mmorpg game from NetEase Games (2018) while Z1 Battle Royale is an FPS mmorpg game from Daybreak Game Company (2018).

Creative Destruction

2018 · NetEase Games

6.9GamingPickz Score

Not listed

Steam: Mostly Positive

Z1 Battle Royale

2018 · Daybreak Game Company

6.2GamingPickz Score

Free

Steam: Mixed

What each one is

Steam files Creative Destruction under FPS and Mmorpg. In contrast, it files Z1 Battle Royale under FPS and Mmorpg.

Creative Destruction

Welcome to the world of Creative Destruction where everything is fully destructible! Creative Destruction is a new FPS/TPS sandbox survival game that features the utmost fun of building and firing.

Description from its Steam store page

Z1 Battle Royale

Z1 Battle Royale is a Free to Play, fast-paced, action arcade, competitive Battle Royale. Staying true to its "King of the Kill" roots, the game has been revamped and restored to the classic feel, look, and gameplay everyone fell in love with. Play solo, duos, or fives and be the last ones standing.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Creative DestructionZ1 Battle Royale
GamingPickz Score6.9/106.2/10
Steam ratingMostly Positive (79%, 18,190)Mixed (56%, 202,362)
Critic aggregateNo aggregate70/100
PriceNot listedFree
Install size3 GB20 GB
Steam Deckunsupportedunsupported
Released20182018
DeveloperNetEase GamesDaybreak Game Company

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Creative Destruction vs Z1 Battle Royale, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Creative DestructionFPS mmorpg game
    Z1 Battle RoyaleFPS mmorpg game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Creative DestructionBattle Royale, Action, Free to Play
    Z1 Battle RoyaleSurvival, Massively Multiplayer, Open World

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Creative DestructionScore 6.9 · 79% on Steam
    Z1 Battle RoyaleScore 6.2 · 56% on Steam · 70 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Creative Destruction18,190 reviews · 3 GB
    Z1 Battle Royale202,362 reviews · 20 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Creative DestructionNot listed
    Z1 Battle RoyaleFree

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Creative DestructionUnsupported
    Z1 Battle RoyaleUnsupported

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Creative Destruction takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Creative Destruction and Z1 Battle Royale on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Creative Destruction (GamingPickz Score 6.9)
  • Lighter on storage: Creative Destruction (3 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Z1 Battle Royale (202,362 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

MultiplayerBattle RoyaleActionFree to PlayShooterFPSMassively MultiplayerFirst-Person

Where they differ

Creative Destruction is also

BuildingThird PersonControllerCasualDestruction

Z1 Battle Royale is also

ZombiesEarly AccessViolentGoreWalking Simulator

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Creative Destruction is relaxed, easy to pick up. Z1 Battle Royale is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Creative DestructionZ1 Battle Royale
Minimum GPUIntel HD Graphics 4600nVidia GeForce GTX 460 series
Minimum CPUIntel Core I3-4160Intel i5 Quad-Core
Minimum RAM2 GB6 GB
Install size3 GB20 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Creative Destruction · Z1 Battle Royale.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Creative Destruction and 0 for Z1 Battle Royale. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Creative Destruction and Z1 Battle Royale in scope?

Creative Destruction has drawn 18,190 Steam reviews and installs in 3 GB. Z1 Battle Royale has drawn 202,362 Steam reviews and installs in 20 GB.

Is Creative Destruction or Z1 Battle Royale better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Creative Destruction rates higher (6.9 to 6.2). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Creative Destruction or Z1 Battle Royale?

One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each