GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Cruelty Squad vs GhostWire: Tokyo

Cruelty Squad is an FPS horror game from Consumer Softproducts (2021) while GhostWire: Tokyo is an action-adventure FPS game from Tango Gameworks (2022).

Cruelty Squad

2021 · Consumer Softproducts

8.1GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

GhostWire: Tokyo

2022 · Tango Gameworks

7.1GamingPickz Score

$59.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Cruelty Squad under FPS and Horror. In contrast, it files GhostWire: Tokyo under Action-Adventure and FPS.

Cruelty Squad

An immersive power fantasy simulator with tactical stealth elements set in a sewage infused garbage world

Description from its Steam store page

GhostWire: Tokyo

Tokyo's population has vanished, and deadly supernatural forces prowl the streets. Use an arsenal of elemental abilities to unravel the truth behind the disappearance and save Tokyo.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Cruelty SquadGhostWire: Tokyo
GamingPickz Score8.1/107.1/10
Steam ratingOverwhelmingly Positive (96%, 24,888)Very Positive (83%, 21,047)
Critic aggregateNo aggregate77/100
Price$19.99$59.99
Install size0.98 GB26 GB
Steam Deckunsupportedverified
Released20212022
DeveloperConsumer SoftproductsTango Gameworks

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Cruelty Squad vs GhostWire: Tokyo, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Cruelty SquadFPS horror game
    GhostWire: TokyoAction-adventure FPS game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Cruelty SquadCapitalism, Surreal, Immersive Sim
    GhostWire: TokyoSupernatural, Open World, First-Person

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Cruelty SquadScore 8.1 · 96% on Steam
    GhostWire: TokyoScore 7.1 · 83% on Steam · 77 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Cruelty Squad24,888 reviews · 1 add-on · 0.98 GB
    GhostWire: Tokyo21,047 reviews · 3 add-ons · 26 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Cruelty Squad$19.99
    GhostWire: Tokyo$59.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Cruelty SquadUnsupported
    GhostWire: TokyoVerified

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Cruelty Squad takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Cruelty Squad and GhostWire: Tokyo on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • Multi-platform
  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Cruelty Squad (GamingPickz Score 8.1)
  • The cheaper right now: Cruelty Squad ($19.99)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: GhostWire: Tokyo (verified)
  • Lighter on storage: Cruelty Squad (0.98 GB)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

SurrealFPSPsychological HorrorCyberpunkFirst-PersonLore-RichAction

Where they differ

Cruelty Squad is also

CapitalismImmersive SimPsychedelicShooterDark HumorStealth

GhostWire: Tokyo is also

SingleplayerSupernaturalOpen WorldHorrorAction-AdventureStory Rich

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Cruelty Squad is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. GhostWire: Tokyo is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Cruelty SquadGhostWire: Tokyo
Minimum GPUNvidia Geforce GTX 1050GTX1060 / RX5500XT / Arc A380* (
Minimum CPUIntel Core i7-7700HQ 2.8GHzCore i7 4770K @3.5ghz / Ryzen 5 2600
Minimum RAM2 GB12 GB
Install size0.98 GB26 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Cruelty Squad · GhostWire: Tokyo.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Cruelty Squad and 4 for GhostWire: Tokyo. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Cruelty Squad and GhostWire: Tokyo in scope?

Cruelty Squad has drawn 24,888 Steam reviews, ships 1 add-on and installs in 0.98 GB. GhostWire: Tokyo has drawn 21,047 Steam reviews, ships 3 add-ons and installs in 26 GB.

Is Cruelty Squad or GhostWire: Tokyo better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Cruelty Squad rates higher (8.1 to 7.1). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Cruelty Squad or GhostWire: Tokyo?

Cruelty Squad is cheaper right now at $19.99, against $59.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each