Crusader Kings III vs Imperator: Rome
Crusader Kings III is an RPG sandbox game from Development Studio (2020) while Imperator: Rome is an open-world sandbox game from Paradox Development Studio (2019).
What each one is
Steam files Crusader Kings III under RPG and Sandbox. In contrast, it files Imperator: Rome under Open-World and Sandbox.
Love, fight, scheme, and claim greatness. Determine your noble house’s legacy in the sprawling grand strategy of Crusader Kings III. Death is only the beginning as you guide your dynasty’s bloodline in the rich and larger-than-life simulation of the Middle Ages.
Dominate the classical Mediterranean in Imperator: Rome, a grand strategy game from Paradox Interactive. Navigate the dangerous waters of politics and diplomacy as you build up your provinces and conquer foreign lands. Now available with special content and the digital artbook.
At a glance
| Crusader Kings III | Imperator: Rome | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 8.1/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (90%, 143,235) | Mixed (66%, 26,891) |
| Critic aggregate | 91/100 | 76/100 |
| Price | $49.99 | $39.99 |
| Install size | 20 GB | — |
| Steam Deck | playable | playable |
| Released | 2020 | 2019 |
| Developer | Development Studio | Paradox Development Studio |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Crusader Kings III vs Imperator: Rome, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Crusader Kings IIIRPG sandbox gameImperator: RomeOpen-world sandbox gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Crusader Kings IIIStrategy, Medieval, Grand StrategyImperator: RomeStrategy, Grand Strategy, SimulationThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Crusader Kings III ✓Score 8.1 · 90% on Steam · 91 criticImperator: RomeScore 6.5 · 66% on Steam · 76 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Crusader Kings III143,235 reviews · 33 add-ons · 20 GBImperator: Rome26,891 reviews · 5 add-onsReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Crusader Kings III$49.99Imperator: Rome ✓$39.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Crusader Kings IIIPlayableImperator: RomePlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueCrusader Kings III and Imperator: Rome on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- Multi-platform
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Crusader Kings III (GamingPickz Score 8.1)
- The cheaper right now: Imperator: Rome ($39.99)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: Crusader Kings III (143,235 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
StrategyGrand StrategySimulationHistoricalManagementSandboxChoices MatterWar
Where they differ
MedievalRPGCharacter CustomizationLife SimRTS4X
RomePolitical SimPoliticsOpen WorldEarly AccessAlternate History
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Crusader Kings III is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Imperator: Rome is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Crusader Kings III | Imperator: Rome | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | Nvidia® GeForce™ GTX 460 |
| Minimum CPU | Intel Core i5-750 | Intel® iCore™ i3-550 |
| Minimum RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Install size | 20 GB | — |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Crusader Kings III · Imperator: Rome.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 6 accessibility features for Crusader Kings III and 0 for Imperator: Rome. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Crusader Kings III and Imperator: Rome in scope?
Crusader Kings III has drawn 143,235 Steam reviews, ships 33 add-ons and installs in 20 GB. Imperator: Rome has drawn 26,891 Steam reviews and ships 5 add-ons.
Is Crusader Kings III or Imperator: Rome better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Crusader Kings III rates higher (8.1 to 6.5). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Crusader Kings III or Imperator: Rome?
Imperator: Rome is cheaper right now at $39.99, against $49.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.