GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

DRAGON BALL FighterZ vs Mount & Blade: Warband

DRAGON BALL FighterZ is a fighting game from Arc System Works (2018) while Mount & Blade: Warband is an action-RPG open-world game from TaleWorlds (2010).

Quick answer: Mount & Blade: Warband rates higher, 8.2 to 8.1 on the GamingPickz Score, and Mount & Blade: Warband is the cheaper at $19.99.

DRAGON BALL FighterZ

2018 · Arc System Works

8.1GamingPickz Score

$59.99

Steam: Very Positive

Mount & Blade: Warband

2010 · TaleWorlds

8.2GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

What each one is

DRAGON BALL FighterZ is filed under Fighting. In contrast, Mount & Blade: Warband under Action-RPG and Open-World.

DRAGON BALL FighterZ

DRAGON BALL FighterZ is born from what makes the DRAGON BALL series so loved and famous: endless spectacular fights with its all-powerful fighters.

Description from its Steam store page

Mount & Blade: Warband

In a land torn asunder by incessant warfare, it is time to assemble your own band of hardened warriors and enter the fray. Lead your men into battle, expand your realm, and claim the ultimate prize: the throne of Calradia!

Description from its Steam store page

Story, characters and reception

DRAGON BALL FighterZ

No Wikipedia detail on file.

Mount & Blade: Warband
Reception

Reception The PC version of Warband received "generally favorable reviews", while the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One versions received "mixed or average reviews", according to Metacritic . Like its predecessor, Warband was praised as a low-cost game with greater replayability and longevity than most contemporary studio-published games. However, several felt that describing Warband as a sequel was overreaching and that the game is better described as a… (Wikipedia)

At a glance

DRAGON BALL FighterZMount & Blade: Warband
GamingPickz Score8.1/108.2/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (90%, 76,719)Overwhelmingly Positive (98%, 172,005)
Critic aggregate85/10078/100
Price$59.99$19.99
Install size6 GB
Steam Deckunsupportedplayable
Released20182010
DeveloperArc System WorksTaleWorlds

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

DRAGON BALL FighterZ vs Mount & Blade: Warband, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    DRAGON BALL FighterZFighting game
    Mount & Blade: WarbandAction-RPG open-world game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    DRAGON BALL FighterZFighting, Anime, Action
    Mount & Blade: WarbandMedieval, RPG, Open World

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    DRAGON BALL FighterZScore 8.1 · 90% on Steam · 85 critic
    Mount & Blade: WarbandScore 8.2 · 98% on Steam · 78 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    DRAGON BALL FighterZ76,719 reviews · 30 add-ons · 6 GB
    Mount & Blade: Warband172,005 reviews · 2 add-ons

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    DRAGON BALL FighterZ$59.99
    Mount & Blade: Warband$19.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    DRAGON BALL FighterZUnsupported
    Mount & Blade: WarbandPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Mount & Blade: Warband takes 3 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

DRAGON BALL FighterZ and Mount & Blade: Warband on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • Mobile
  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The cheaper right now: Mount & Blade: Warband ($19.99)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: Mount & Blade: Warband (playable)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Mount & Blade: Warband (172,005 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

ActionMultiplayerSingleplayerThird PersonAdventure

Where they differ

DRAGON BALL FighterZ is also

FightingAnime2D FighterLocal MultiplayerCompetitiveController

Mount & Blade: Warband is also

MedievalRPGOpen WorldStrategySandboxModdable

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, DRAGON BALL FighterZ is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Mount & Blade: Warband is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

DRAGON BALL FighterZMount & Blade: Warband
Minimum GPURadeon HD 68703D graphics card with 64MB RAM
Minimum CPUAMD FX-4350, 4.2 GHz / Intel Core i5-3470, 3.20 GHzIntel Pentium 4 2.0 GHz
Minimum RAM4 GB0.5 GB
Install size6 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: DRAGON BALL FighterZ · Mount & Blade: Warband.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for DRAGON BALL FighterZ and 0 for Mount & Blade: Warband. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are DRAGON BALL FighterZ and Mount & Blade: Warband in scope?

DRAGON BALL FighterZ has drawn 76,719 Steam reviews, ships 30 add-ons and installs in 6 GB. Mount & Blade: Warband has drawn 172,005 Steam reviews and ships 2 add-ons.

Is DRAGON BALL FighterZ or Mount & Blade: Warband better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Mount & Blade: Warband rates higher (8.2 to 8.1). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, DRAGON BALL FighterZ or Mount & Blade: Warband?

Mount & Blade: Warband is cheaper right now at $19.99, against $59.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Should I get DRAGON BALL FighterZ or Mount & Blade: Warband?

Mount & Blade: Warband rates higher, 8.2 to 8.1 on the GamingPickz Score, and Mount & Blade: Warband is the cheaper at $19.99. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each