GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Due Process vs Splitgate: Arena Warfare

Due Process is an FPS simulation game from Giant Enemy Crab (2020) while Splitgate: Arena Warfare is an FPS strategy game from 1047 Games (2019).

Due Process

2020 · Giant Enemy Crab

6.9GamingPickz Score

$9.99

Steam: Very Positive

Splitgate: Arena Warfare

2019 · 1047 Games

8.2GamingPickz Score

Free

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Due Process under FPS and Simulation. In contrast, it files Splitgate: Arena Warfare under FPS and Strategy.

Due Process

A PVP tactical FPS about PLANNING & EXECUTION. Sound strategy and good teamwork are essential for victory because new PROCEDURALLY-GENERATED MAPS are delivered every week. You'll face a new tactical challenge every round.

Description from its Steam store page

Splitgate: Arena Warfare

Splitgate is a free-to-play, fast-paced multiplayer shooter that features player-controlled portals. This sci-fi shooter takes the FPS genre to a new dimension with its portal mechanics, delivering high-flying, multi-dimensional combat.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Due ProcessSplitgate: Arena Warfare
GamingPickz Score6.9/108.2/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (81%, 8,556)Very Positive (91%, 110,493)
Critic aggregateNo aggregateNo aggregate
Price$9.99Free
Install size10 GB15 GB
Steam Deckplayableunsupported
Released20202019
DeveloperGiant Enemy Crab1047 Games

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Due Process vs Splitgate: Arena Warfare, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Due ProcessFPS simulation game
    Splitgate: Arena WarfareFPS strategy game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Due ProcessEarly Access, Adventure, 3D
    Splitgate: Arena WarfareFree to Play, FPS, Arena Shooter

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Due ProcessScore 6.9 · 81% on Steam
    Splitgate: Arena WarfareScore 8.2 · 91% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Due Process8,556 reviews · 2 add-ons · 10 GB
    Splitgate: Arena Warfare110,493 reviews · 15 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Due Process$9.99
    Splitgate: Arena WarfareFree

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Due ProcessPlayable
    Splitgate: Arena WarfareUnsupported

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Splitgate: Arena Warfare takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Due Process and Splitgate: Arena Warfare on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Splitgate: Arena Warfare (GamingPickz Score 8.2)
  • The cheaper right now: Splitgate: Arena Warfare (Free)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: Due Process (playable)
  • Lighter on storage: Due Process (10 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Splitgate: Arena Warfare (110,493 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

TacticalFPSTeam-BasedPvPe-sportsMultiplayerOnline Co-OpShooter

Where they differ

Due Process is also

Early AccessAdventure3DFuturisticCyberpunkSimulation

Splitgate: Arena Warfare is also

Free to PlayArena ShooterActionFast-PacedFirst-PersonSci-fi

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Due Process is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Splitgate: Arena Warfare is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Due ProcessSplitgate: Arena Warfare
Minimum GPUNvidia GeForce GTX 760; ATI RX 570NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 1GB
Minimum CPU3000-series Intel i5; 2000-series AMD Ryzen 3Any dual core CPU
Minimum RAM6 GB6 GB
Install size10 GB15 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Due Process · Splitgate: Arena Warfare.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Due Process and 1 for Splitgate: Arena Warfare. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Due Process and Splitgate: Arena Warfare in scope?

Due Process has drawn 8,556 Steam reviews, ships 2 add-ons and installs in 10 GB. Splitgate: Arena Warfare has drawn 110,493 Steam reviews and installs in 15 GB.

Is Due Process or Splitgate: Arena Warfare better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Splitgate: Arena Warfare rates higher (8.2 to 6.9). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Due Process or Splitgate: Arena Warfare?

Splitgate: Arena Warfare is cheaper right now at Free, against $9.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each