GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Elite Dangerous vs Tribes: Ascend

Elite Dangerous is a mmorpg open-world game from Frontier Developments (2014) while Tribes: Ascend is an FPS open-world game from Hi-Rez Studios (2012).

Elite Dangerous

2014 · Frontier Developments

7.0GamingPickz Score

$5.99

Steam: Mostly Positive

Tribes: Ascend

2012 · Hi-Rez Studios

7.3GamingPickz Score

Not listed

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Elite Dangerous under Mmorpg and Open-World. In contrast, it files Tribes: Ascend under FPS and Open-World.

Elite Dangerous

Take control of your own starship and blaze your trail in an ever-changing galaxy. Master the arts of combat, mining and trade or venture out into the unknown across a 1:1 scale universe.

Description from its Steam store page

Tribes: Ascend

This edition packages weapon DLC from ten previous expansions as well new featured content.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Elite DangerousTribes: Ascend
GamingPickz Score7.0/107.3/10
Steam ratingMostly Positive (77%, 107,348)Very Positive (81%, 8,582)
Critic aggregate80/10086/100
Price$5.99Not listed
Install size25 GB
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20142012
DeveloperFrontier DevelopmentsHi-Rez Studios

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Elite Dangerous vs Tribes: Ascend, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Elite DangerousMmorpg open-world game
    Tribes: AscendFPS open-world game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Elite DangerousSpace Sim, Space, Open World
    Tribes: AscendFree to Play, FPS, Action

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Elite DangerousScore 7.0 · 77% on Steam · 80 critic
    Tribes: AscendScore 7.3 · 81% on Steam · 86 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Elite Dangerous107,348 reviews · 2 add-ons · 25 GB
    Tribes: Ascend8,582 reviews

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Elite Dangerous$5.99
    Tribes: AscendNot listed

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Elite DangerousPlayable
    Tribes: AscendPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Tribes: Ascend takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Elite Dangerous and Tribes: Ascend on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularityTribes: Ascend

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • Multi-platform
  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Tribes: Ascend (GamingPickz Score 7.3)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Elite Dangerous (107,348 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

Open WorldSci-fiMassively MultiplayerMultiplayerFirst-PersonActionAdventureOnline Co-Op

Where they differ

Elite Dangerous is also

Space SimSpaceExplorationSimulationVRSandbox

Tribes: Ascend is also

Free to PlayFPSShooterFast-PacedFuturisticCo-op

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Elite Dangerous is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Tribes: Ascend is demanding, for players who want a challenge.

System requirements, side by side

Elite DangerousTribes: Ascend
Minimum GPUNvidia GTX 470/AMD R7 240
Minimum CPUQuad Core CPU (4 x 2Ghz)Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz
Minimum RAM6 GB2 GB
Install size25 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Elite Dangerous · Tribes: Ascend.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Elite Dangerous and 0 for Tribes: Ascend. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Elite Dangerous and Tribes: Ascend in scope?

Elite Dangerous has drawn 107,348 Steam reviews, ships 2 add-ons and installs in 25 GB. Tribes: Ascend has drawn 8,582 Steam reviews.

Is Elite Dangerous or Tribes: Ascend better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Tribes: Ascend rates higher (7.3 to 7.0). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Elite Dangerous or Tribes: Ascend?

One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each