GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Eternal Card Game vs The Elder Scrolls: Legends

Eternal Card Game is a mmorpg strategy game from Dire Wolf (2018) while The Elder Scrolls: Legends is a strategy game from Sparkypants Studios, LLC (2017).

Eternal Card Game

2018 · Dire Wolf

6.6GamingPickz Score

Free

Steam: Mostly Positive

The Elder Scrolls: Legends

2017 · Sparkypants Studios, LLC

6.5GamingPickz Score

Not listed

Steam: Mostly Positive

What each one is

Steam files Eternal Card Game under Mmorpg and Strategy. In contrast, it files The Elder Scrolls: Legends under Strategy.

Eternal Card Game

Six-guns and sorcery collide in Eternal, the new strategy card game of unlimited choices and unbelievable fun. Eternal brings AAA pace and polish to the infinite possibilities of a deep strategy card game. The only limits are your own creativity.

Description from its Steam store page

The Elder Scrolls: Legends

The Elder Scrolls: Legends™ is an award- winning free-to-play strategy card game based on the world and lore of the Elder Scrolls series. Play for hours or minutes across many game modes that are easy to learn but challenging to master.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Eternal Card GameThe Elder Scrolls: Legends
GamingPickz Score6.6/106.5/10
Steam ratingMostly Positive (77%, 7,040)Mostly Positive (75%, 11,074)
Critic aggregateNo aggregateNo aggregate
PriceFreeNot listed
Install size3 GB3 GB
Steam Deckplayableverified
Released20182017
DeveloperDire WolfSparkypants Studios, LLC

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Eternal Card Game vs The Elder Scrolls: Legends, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Eternal Card GameMmorpg strategy game
    The Elder Scrolls: LegendsStrategy game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Eternal Card GameFree to Play, Card Game, Card Battler
    The Elder Scrolls: LegendsFree to Play, Card Game, Trading Card Game

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Eternal Card GameScore 6.6 · 77% on Steam
    The Elder Scrolls: LegendsScore 6.5 · 75% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Eternal Card Game7,040 reviews · 1 add-on · 3 GB
    The Elder Scrolls: Legends11,074 reviews · 3 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Eternal Card GameFree
    The Elder Scrolls: LegendsNot listed

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Eternal Card GamePlayable
    The Elder Scrolls: LegendsVerified

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Eternal Card Game and The Elder Scrolls: Legends on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • Better on a Steam Deck: The Elder Scrolls: Legends (verified)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

Free to PlayCard GameStrategyDeckbuildingCasualTrading Card GameMultiplayerSingleplayer

Where they differ

Eternal Card Game is also

Card BattlerMassively MultiplayerEarly AccessPvP

The Elder Scrolls: Legends is also

Board GameGreat SoundtrackTacticalStory RichAtmosphericDark Fantasy

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Eternal Card Game is relaxed, easy to pick up. The Elder Scrolls: Legends is relaxed, easy to pick up.

System requirements, side by side

Eternal Card GameThe Elder Scrolls: Legends
Minimum GPUGraphics card with DX10
Minimum CPUIntel Pentium D
Minimum RAM2 GB
Install size3 GB3 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Eternal Card Game · The Elder Scrolls: Legends.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Eternal Card Game and 0 for The Elder Scrolls: Legends. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Eternal Card Game and The Elder Scrolls: Legends in scope?

Eternal Card Game has drawn 7,040 Steam reviews, ships 1 add-on and installs in 3 GB. The Elder Scrolls: Legends has drawn 11,074 Steam reviews and installs in 3 GB.

Is Eternal Card Game or The Elder Scrolls: Legends better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Eternal Card Game rates higher (6.6 to 6.5). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Eternal Card Game or The Elder Scrolls: Legends?

One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each