GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

EVERSPACE 2 vs 鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal

EVERSPACE 2 is an action-adventure action-RPG game from ROCKFISH Games (2023) while 鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal is an action-adventure action-RPG game from 鬼谷工作室 (2023).

EVERSPACE 2

2023 · ROCKFISH Games

7.5GamingPickz Score

$49.99

Steam: Very Positive

鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal

2023 · 鬼谷工作室

5.9GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Mixed

What each one is

Steam files EVERSPACE 2 under Action-Adventure and Action-RPG. In contrast, it files 鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal under Action-Adventure and Action-RPG.

EVERSPACE 2

EVERSPACE 2 is a fast-paced single-player spaceship shooter with exploration in space and on planets, tons of loot, RPG elements, mining, and crafting. Experience an exciting sci-fi story set in a vivid, handcrafted open world full of secrets, puzzles, and perils.

Description from its Steam store page

鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal

Tale of Immortal is an open-world sandbox based on Chinese mythology and cultivation. You will grow to become immortal, conquer the beasts from the Classic of Mountains and Season, make your choices carefully and grasp your own destiny.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

EVERSPACE 2鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal
GamingPickz Score7.5/105.9/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (86%, 13,004)Mixed (56%, 224,668)
Critic aggregate81/100No aggregate
Price$49.99$19.99
Install size35 GB25 GB
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20232023
DeveloperROCKFISH Games鬼谷工作室

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

EVERSPACE 2 vs 鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    EVERSPACE 2Action-adventure action-RPG game
    鬼谷八荒 Tale of ImmortalAction-adventure action-RPG game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    EVERSPACE 2Shooter, Space, Loot
    鬼谷八荒 Tale of ImmortalManagement, Simulation, Mythology

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    EVERSPACE 2Score 7.5 · 86% on Steam · 81 critic
    鬼谷八荒 Tale of ImmortalScore 5.9 · 56% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    EVERSPACE 213,004 reviews · 8 add-ons · 35 GB
    鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal224,668 reviews · 4 add-ons · 25 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    EVERSPACE 2$49.99
    鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal$19.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    EVERSPACE 2Playable
    鬼谷八荒 Tale of ImmortalPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

EVERSPACE 2 and 鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: EVERSPACE 2 (GamingPickz Score 7.5)
  • The cheaper right now: 鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal ($19.99)
  • Lighter on storage: 鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal (25 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: 鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal (224,668 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

ExplorationAction RPGAction-AdventureStory RichAdventureActionSimulationRPG

Where they differ

EVERSPACE 2 is also

ShooterSpaceLootLooter ShooterOpen WorldPvE

鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal is also

ManagementMythologySandboxTactical RPGDating SimChoose Your Own Adventure

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, EVERSPACE 2 is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. 鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

EVERSPACE 2鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal
Minimum GPUHD4400
Minimum CPU2.50GHz
Minimum RAM4 GB
Install size35 GB25 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: EVERSPACE 2 · 鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for EVERSPACE 2 and 1 for 鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are EVERSPACE 2 and 鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal in scope?

EVERSPACE 2 has drawn 13,004 Steam reviews, ships 8 add-ons and installs in 35 GB. 鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal has drawn 224,668 Steam reviews, ships 4 add-ons and installs in 25 GB.

Is EVERSPACE 2 or 鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal better?

By the GamingPickz Score, EVERSPACE 2 rates higher (7.5 to 5.9). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, EVERSPACE 2 or 鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal?

鬼谷八荒 Tale of Immortal is cheaper right now at $19.99, against $49.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each