GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

EVERSPACE vs No Man's Sky

EVERSPACE is a roguelike simulation game from ROCKFISH Games (2017) while No Man's Sky is an action-adventure FPS game from Hello Games (2016).

EVERSPACE

2017 · ROCKFISH Games

7.0GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Mostly Positive

No Man's Sky

2016 · Hello Games

7.3GamingPickz Score

$59.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files EVERSPACE under Roguelike and Simulation. In contrast, it files No Man's Sky under Action-Adventure and FPS.

EVERSPACE

EVERSPACE™ combines fast-paced combat with roguelike elements, great visuals and a captivating story. It takes you on a challenging journey through an ever-changing, beautifully crafted universe full of surprises. Shoot, craft and loot your way to victory while the odds are stacked against you.

Description from its Steam store page

No Man's Sky

No Man's Sky is a game about exploration and survival in an infinite procedurally generated universe.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

EVERSPACENo Man's Sky
GamingPickz Score7.0/107.3/10
Steam ratingMostly Positive (78%, 11,465)Very Positive (85%, 414,641)
Critic aggregate79/10061/100
Price$19.99$59.99
Install size12 GB15 GB
Steam Deckplayableverified
Released20172016
DeveloperROCKFISH GamesHello Games

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

EVERSPACE vs No Man's Sky, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    EVERSPACERoguelike simulation game
    No Man's SkyAction-adventure FPS game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    EVERSPACESpace, Action Roguelike, Action
    No Man's SkyOpen World, Open World Survival Craft, Space

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    EVERSPACEScore 7.0 · 78% on Steam · 79 critic
    No Man's SkyScore 7.3 · 85% on Steam · 61 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    EVERSPACE11,465 reviews · 2 add-ons · 12 GB
    No Man's Sky414,641 reviews · 1 add-on · 15 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    EVERSPACE$19.99
    No Man's Sky$59.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    EVERSPACEPlayable
    No Man's SkyVerified

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

No Man's Sky takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

EVERSPACE and No Man's Sky on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • Multi-platform
  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: No Man's Sky (GamingPickz Score 7.3)
  • The cheaper right now: EVERSPACE ($19.99)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: No Man's Sky (verified)
  • Lighter on storage: EVERSPACE (12 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: No Man's Sky (414,641 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

SpaceActionIndieSci-fiSpace SimSingleplayerVRExploration

Where they differ

EVERSPACE is also

Action RoguelikeRogue-liteFlightShooterRogue-like6DOF

No Man's Sky is also

Open WorldOpen World Survival CraftProcedural GenerationAdventureMultiplayerSandbox

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, EVERSPACE is demanding, for players who want a challenge. No Man's Sky is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

EVERSPACENo Man's Sky
Minimum GPUNvidia GTX 1060 3GB
Minimum CPUIntel Core i3
Minimum RAM8 GB
Install size12 GB15 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: EVERSPACE · No Man's Sky.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for EVERSPACE and 10 for No Man's Sky. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are EVERSPACE and No Man's Sky in scope?

EVERSPACE has drawn 11,465 Steam reviews, ships 2 add-ons and installs in 12 GB. No Man's Sky has drawn 414,641 Steam reviews, ships 1 add-on and installs in 15 GB.

Is EVERSPACE or No Man's Sky better?

By the GamingPickz Score, No Man's Sky rates higher (7.3 to 7.0). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, EVERSPACE or No Man's Sky?

EVERSPACE is cheaper right now at $19.99, against $59.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each