GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Fallout: New Vegas vs Saints Row: The Third

Fallout: New Vegas is an action-RPG FPS game from Obsidian Entertainment (2010) while Saints Row: The Third is an action-adventure open-world game (2011).

Quick answer: Fallout: New Vegas rates higher, 8.4 to 8.1 on the GamingPickz Score, and Saints Row: The Third is the cheaper at $2.49.

Fallout: New Vegas

2010 · Obsidian Entertainment

8.4GamingPickz Score

$9.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

Saints Row: The Third

2011 · Studio not listed

8.1GamingPickz Score

$2.49

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

What each one is

Fallout: New Vegas is filed under Action-RPG and FPS. In contrast, Saints Row: The Third under Action-Adventure and Open-World.

Fallout: New Vegas

Welcome to Vegas. New Vegas. Enjoy your stay!

Description from its Steam store page

Saints Row: The Third

Get ready for the most out-landish gameplay scenarios ever seen as the Third Street Saints take on the Syndicate!

Description from its Steam store page

Story, characters and reception

Fallout: New Vegas
Plot

"Mr. House" redirects here. It is not to be confused with Dr. (Wikipedia)

Saints Row: The Third
Plot

Three years after the events of Saints Row 2 , the 3rd Street Saints have merged with the Ultor Corporation to become a media and consumer empire with their own brand. While robbing a bank in Stilwater to promote an upcoming film about themselves, the Boss ( Troy Baker , Kenn Michael , Robin Atkin Downes , Laura Bailey , Tara Platt , Rebecca Sanabria or Steve Blum ) and the Saints' top lieutenants, Shaundi ( Danielle Nicolet ) and Johnny Gat ( Daniel Dae… (Wikipedia)

Reception

Saints Row: The Third reviews The game received "generally favorable" reviews, according to video game review score aggregator Metacritic . Some said the game did not try to be more than a good time, and described it as a variant of "ridiculous", "zany", or "absurd". In another way, others called it "juvenile". (Wikipedia)

At a glance

Fallout: New VegasSaints Row: The Third
GamingPickz Score8.4/108.1/10
Steam ratingOverwhelmingly Positive (96%, 261,194)Overwhelmingly Positive (96%, 69,665)
Critic aggregate84/10084/100
Price$9.99$2.49
Install size
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20102011
DeveloperObsidian Entertainment

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Fallout: New Vegas vs Saints Row: The Third, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Fallout: New VegasAction-RPG FPS game
    Saints Row: The ThirdAction-adventure open-world game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Fallout: New VegasOpen World, RPG, Post-apocalyptic
    Saints Row: The ThirdOpen World, Action, Comedy

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Fallout: New VegasScore 8.4 · 96% on Steam · 84 critic
    Saints Row: The ThirdScore 8.1 · 96% on Steam · 84 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Fallout: New Vegas261,194 reviews · 7 add-ons
    Saints Row: The Third69,665 reviews · 20 add-ons

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Fallout: New Vegas$9.99
    Saints Row: The Third$2.49

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Fallout: New VegasPlayable
    Saints Row: The ThirdPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Fallout: New Vegas and Saints Row: The Third on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • Multi-platform
  • Nintendo

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Fallout: New Vegas (GamingPickz Score 8.4)
  • The cheaper right now: Saints Row: The Third ($2.49)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Fallout: New Vegas (261,194 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

Open WorldRPGSingleplayerActionAdventureCharacter CustomizationSandboxShooter

Where they differ

Fallout: New Vegas is also

Post-apocalypticModdableStory RichExplorationFirst-PersonFPS

Saints Row: The Third is also

ComedyCo-opThird-Person ShooterFunnyOnline Co-OpGreat Soundtrack

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Fallout: New Vegas is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Saints Row: The Third is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Fallout: New VegasSaints Row: The Third
Minimum GPU320MB Video RAM GPU w/ Shader Model 3.0 support. NVIDIA® GeForce® 8800 series
Minimum CPUDual Core 2.0GHz2GHz Dual Core Processor (Intel® Core 2 Duo
Minimum RAM2 GB2 GB
Install size

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Fallout: New Vegas · Saints Row: The Third.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Fallout: New Vegas and 1 for Saints Row: The Third. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Fallout: New Vegas and Saints Row: The Third in scope?

Fallout: New Vegas has drawn 261,194 Steam reviews and ships 7 add-ons. Saints Row: The Third has drawn 69,665 Steam reviews and ships 20 add-ons.

Is Fallout: New Vegas or Saints Row: The Third better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Fallout: New Vegas rates higher (8.4 to 8.1). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Fallout: New Vegas or Saints Row: The Third?

Saints Row: The Third is cheaper right now at $2.49, against $9.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Should I get Fallout: New Vegas or Saints Row: The Third?

Fallout: New Vegas rates higher, 8.4 to 8.1 on the GamingPickz Score, and Saints Row: The Third is the cheaper at $2.49. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each